I don;t know how you can conclude what sulfate level is problematic, or how you can conclude it didn't come from oxidation of sulfur. I do not know the answer to either question.
I don't know if this applies to the OP, but IMO, it would be incorrect to conclude that sulfur in an aerobic environment cannot become colonized with organisms that use O2 to oxidize the sulfur to sulfate, which could product an unlimited amount of sulfate.
en.wikipedia.org
Do you claim elemental sulfur is oxidized to sulfate aerobically in normal marine aquarium conditions?
Most sulfur compounds and elemental sulfur may be oxidized aerobically, also HS escaping an SD. We do know that!
At what conditions elemental sulfur may be oxidized aerobically? We also do know that! That is why we use elemental sulfur in life support systems and not other sulfur compounds often used in water cleaning facilities.
T. denitrificans, responsible for using nitrate to oxidize elemental sulfur using a BADES application, can make good use of many sulfur compounds aerobically and anaerobically, including elemental sulfur but only if following its anaerobic pathway.
Maybe 600ppm of Total S measured is produced by the SD present? Also, It may come from other sources! It may include a toxic part. I do not know! That is what I aim to say since the beginning of this discussion.
As far as I know, you are the only one connecting a BADES application or and the presence of elemental sulfur to aerobic elemental sulfur oxidation in a marine aquarium and making it an issue.
Those who did 7 years of research before using elemental sulfur in very high quantities in big public marine aquaria and did this for decades, they never reported aerobic oxidation of elemental sulfur. If aerobic elemental sulfur oxidation takes place in marine aquarium systems, even when containing a lot of elemental sulfur, It must be very insignificant.
As long
@ca1ore does not respond with new info there is nothing to add or to change to my previously made conclusion.