I am interested to see if anyone will be gentle enough to try to see if we can come to a peer review agreement the moon does effect refractometers just like the ocean. I have no evidence but it would logically correlate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A refractometer works by measuring the refraction of light through a solution. Not sure how a gravitational phenomena like the moon and tides has anything to do with that.I am interested to see if anyone will be gentle enough to try to see if we can come to a peer review agreement the moon does effect refractometers just like the ocean. I have no evidence but it would logically correlate.
Correct, put the fluid on the refracrometer and look at the salinity number on the right. 35 in your case. Twist screw until the blue line matches the 35 on your bottle.Alright I've ordered a lab grade high percision hydrometer and 35ppt solution from brs. Will be cross comparing my readings. 35 ppt would be the numbers on the right then? I was under the assumption 35 ppm of salt to remedy the, "vampire blood" rodi water. I clearly can see now left is sg specific gravitiy right is ppt parts per thousand.
I have an ATC however I will attempt to match my tanks water temp to calibration solution for a more precise analog calibration. So with my conception of moon cycle effecting refractometers is that visual properties of measuring the specifical gravity are potentially effected with moon phases resulting in user thinking they are "screwed" as far as the calibration adjustment handle.Oh, and make sure you are accounting for temperature when you use your hydrometer. Temperature affects them because the hydrometer measures density, not refraction. If the water is warmer than the calibration temperature it will read lower in the hydrometer than it actually is.
For example, if your hydrometer is calibrated at 60F but your water is 78 a water sample of 1.025 will actually read as 1.023 in the hydrometer.
I wasn’t referring to the ATC refractometer, I meant the hydrometer. I’m assuming it’s a normal glass drop-in hydrometer? Those don’t have ATC.I have an ATC however I will attempt to match my tanks water temp to calibration solution for a more precise analog calibration. So with my conception of moon cycle effecting refractometers is that visual properties of measuring the specifical gravity are potentially effected with moon phases resulting in user thinking they are "screwed" as far as the calibration adjustment handle.
Again, I emphasize the moon will have nothing to do with your mechanical device. How it could is beyond lost to me and several others.I am interested to see if anyone will be gentle enough to try to see if we can come to a peer review agreement the moon does effect refractometers just like the ocean. I have no evidence but it would logically correlate.
Gravitational pull of a moon could effect the visual measurement properties of specific gravity on the medium measured being marine water hense ocean is my proposition.Again, I emphasize the moon will have nothing to do with your mechanical device. How it could is beyond lost to me and several others.
My misunderstanding of hydrometer was thinking refractometer. I kinda feel hype breasted into brs version without an ATC however I may just get another hydrometer with atc to have more foundation to cross compare data.Oh, and make sure you are accounting for temperature when you use your hydrometer. Temperature affects them because the hydrometer measures density, not refraction. If the water is warmer than the calibration temperature it will read lower in the hydrometer than it actually is.
For example, if your hydrometer is calibrated at 60F but your water is 78 a water sample of 1.025 will actually read as 1.023 in the hydrometer.
Bro no wayI only test during low tide with my refractometer.
I am positive that his/her/their reply was sarcasm... Tide is not going to affect refractometer readings...Bro no way
I speculate not possible to any meaningful/measurable extent at the hobby level.I am interested to see if anyone will be gentle enough to try to see if we can come to a peer review agreement the moon does effect refractometers just like the ocean. I have no evidence but it would logically correlate.
The relation being marine water with high mineral content thus having magnetic values potentially not effecting the lab grade hydrometers but refractometers. I also have no awarenes on how the illusion of light as a resolution of measurement through a vacuum with gravitional pulls I'm sure being stronger at different water temps. Next we will test if north east south west effects the sg in refractometery. Lol I'm sure it doesn't effect it much and the screw really just being easy to uncalibrated is the case. But I'm not doubting there is loads more to it we don't know. Allright?I speculate not possible to any meaningful/measurable extent at the hobby level.
Gravitational pull of the Moon and Sun (to a lesser extent) obviously has significant effects on ocean tides and such but what is the basis for the question as it relates to hobby-grade refractometers?
But the tide and moon phases don't affect the magnetic field and have nothing to do with magnetism as a whole, they're gravitational... Compasses are magnetically driven devices; if moon phases and tide changes affected the magnetic field, don't you think we'd have stopped using compasses long ago? Also, a refractometer works with light, which also is unaffected by changes in the magnetic field... I think you're inquisitive, which is a good trait, but it's clear you also need to learn how these things work, otherwise you're searching for snipes...The relation being marine water with high mineral content thus having magnetic values potentially not effecting the lab grade hydrometers but refractometers. I also have no awarenes on how the illusion of light as a resolution of measurement through a vacuum with gravitional pulls I'm sure being stronger at different water temps. Next we will test if north east south west effects the sg in refractometery. Lol I'm sure it doesn't effect it much and the screw really just being easy to uncalibrated is the case. But I'm not doubting there is loads more to it we don't know. Allright?
Mine isn’t affected by any of this, I modified it by adding a quantum flux capacitor in parallel with a gravitational sheer compensator, works a treat.The relation being marine water with high mineral content thus having magnetic values potentially not effecting the lab grade hydrometers but refractometers. I also have no awarenes on how the illusion of light as a resolution of measurement through a vacuum with gravitional pulls I'm sure being stronger at different water temps. Next we will test if north east south west effects the sg in refractometery. Lol I'm sure it doesn't effect it much and the screw really just being easy to uncalibrated is the case. But I'm not doubting there is loads more to it we don't know. Allright?
I have the exact same one and I calibrated with RODI as well. No issues and have not had to recalibrate for two months. I also took my water to my LFS for testing last week and my salinity measurement was only off by .001What does a moon cycle have to do with a mechanical instrument. You have to routinely calibrate it. Especially if it's a variance of one of these....
![]()
You stare at them funny and they loose calibration.
I am interested to see if anyone will be gentle enough to try to see if we can come to a peer review agreement the moon does effect refractometers just like the ocean. I have no evidence but it would logically correlate.
You smoking too much of what you have as your pic!Gravitational pull of a moon could effect the visual measurement properties of specific gravity on the medium measured being marine water hense ocean is my proposition.
Seriously?I am interested to see if anyone will be gentle enough to try to see if we can come to a peer review agreement the moon does effect refractometers just like the ocean. I have no evidence but it would logically correlate.

