I sent them an email this morning, I'll let folks know if there is any response:
Hello ACI,
You may or may not care, but your reputation is suffering by putting out misinformation about the effects of kalkwasser (calcium hydroxide solution) dosing. I am likely the chemist that you claim doesn’t understand the chemistry of your claims, but I think you need to read up on the effects of kalkwasser on calcium and alkalinity long term. This misinformation is now the topic of a public thread in my forum at Reef2Reef.
Kalkwasser is close to balanced for calcium and alkalinity dosing, and actually delivers a slight EXCESS of calcium over time, not a deficiency, when the alk and calcium are used to make coral skeletons and other calcium carbonate materials in a reef tank. Anything different that you observed was for other reasons. These other reasons can include alkalinity additions from some other means, such as declining nitrate or water changes with a high alk mix.
Why is kalkwasser balanced?
Calcium hydroxide delivers one unit of calcium and two units of alkalinity (2 OH-). Calcium carbonate contains one unit of calcium and two units of alkalinity (one carbonate = two units of alkalinity, which comes from TWO hydroxide ions):
Ca(OH)2 --> Ca++ + 2OH-
OH– + CO2 → HCO3–
OH– + HCO3– → CO3— + H2O
Ca++ + CO3-- --> CaCO3
Why is it not perfectly balanced for use in a reef aquarium long term? Because a small amount of magnesium and strontium get into the calcium carbonate in place of some of the calcium. Thus, it is a little less than one calcium per two units of alkalinity to make coral skeletons, and if you use kalkwasser to deliver all alkalinity needed by the tank, and there are not other things impacting the values such as water changes, then calcium will rise long term. This has been demonstrated thousands of times, including in my own tank where I used only kalkwasser for 20 years.
Thanks for listening and Happy reefing!
Randy Holmes-Farley
PS. This was your comment containing the misinformation: