What is This!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Psy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None
Guess I will skip this water change then. I dont have alot of corals ones I do have are little, here some how do I keep them looking like that but keep lvl up a little dont run carbon gfo skimmer 24-7? Sorry for beginner questions

20180603_225908.jpg


20180810_233128.jpg


20180818_204700.jpg
 
Just knowing helps, as @saltyfilmfolks stated to high or too low can cause issues
This stuff Starr long time ago I had ick lost all fish, where fish less for 11 weeks no feeding or anything well vary little 1 time a week I feed shrimp and crabs and starfish doing weekly water changes. We just added fish 3 weeks ago.
 
Guess I will skip this water change then. I dont have alot of corals ones I do have are little, here some how do I keep them looking like that but keep lvl up a little dont run carbon gfo skimmer 24-7? Sorry for beginner questions

20180603_225908.jpg


20180810_233128.jpg


20180818_204700.jpg
If the corals are suffereing I’d donthe water change as it may be a toxin.
But test first for a limitation.
If the algae sucked up all the no3 , that may be why the coral look bad now.
Hard to say.
 
As JSKER suggested , test the no3 and Po4.
In some cases a limitation of one or the other can encourage growth. In fact some organisms seem to encourage that limitation.

So yea , too Clean kinda.
Ok so I test them and no3 no4 are not detectable.
 
If the corals are suffereing I’d donthe water change as it may be a toxin.
But test first for a limitation.
If the algae sucked up all the no3 , that may be why the coral look bad now.
Hard to say.
Only ones that look bad are the hammer and frog spawn corals
 
It is like a blond hair algae, usually caused by high nitrates
It does look filamentous like lyngbya. Either way both are products of nutrient limitation or one nutrient suppressing the other.
Ok so I test them and no3 no4 are not detectable.
We are past ammonia at this point. Though having none is a good sign. Po4 testing would help here.

As others stated, manual removal is best. You can try the no water change and increased feedings for a month. I wouldn't exceed feeding twice a day as it can hurt water quality but a build up of detritus can help increase P and the fish can increase N.

Otherwise, stick to weekly or biweekly water changes as you have been, reduced to 10% and start dosing potassium phosphate(seachem flourish phosphorus) and sodium nitrate(purchased from amazon). You don't need to go buck wild on dosing. Maintaining phosphates around 0.02-0.08 and nitrates between 2-10ppm. Remember, what you dose needs to be tested.
 
It does look filamentous like lyngbya. Either way both are products of nutrient limitation or one nutrient suppressing the other.

We are past ammonia at this point. Though having none is a good sign. Po4 testing would help here.

As others stated, manual removal is best. You can try the no water change and increased feedings for a month. I wouldn't exceed feeding twice a day as it can hurt water quality but a build up of detritus can help increase P and the fish can increase N.

Otherwise, stick to weekly or biweekly water changes as you have been, reduced to 10% and start dosing potassium phosphate(seachem flourish phosphorus) and sodium nitrate(purchased from amazon). You don't need to go buck wild on dosing. Maintaining phosphates around 0.02-0.08 and nitrates between 2-10ppm. Remember, what you dose needs to be tested.
Ok look into dosing them, feeding I will go up to 3-4 times weekly and do biweekly water change of 32 gal. Removal of the stuff going to be hard as it on alot of stuff. if I get most of it will the rest die off overtime?
 
Wow thanks to everyone who jump in and help.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top