120 vs 150 vs 180

biokeeper

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
45
Reaction score
41
Location
The Ocean
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’m currently looking to upgrade to what I am hoping to consider my “dream build” and one that will last a long time.

I’m torn between 120g, 150, and 180. (4x2x2, 5x2x2, or 6x2x2)

Are the gear requirements for these 3 systems pretty similar (In terms of flow and other equipment)? I’d like to run a mixed reef with a decent amount of sps near the top level of the system.

Any insight is appreciated!
 
Go for the 180-gallon, mainly because there's not a huge difference in requirements (other than maybe another light or slightly larger return pump) for most of those setups. When I upgraded I had a similar dilemma and decided to opt for the biggest tank I could reasonably expect to fit down the stairs (6x2x2).

You'll find that in terms of equipment (skimmer, reactors, UV, etc.) there's not a huge difference between a 150-gallon system and a 180-gallon system, and often if you need to go with a larger model skimmer (etc.) the price difference isn't astronomical.

Feel free to check out my build setup where I detail everything I run on my 200-gallon Red Sea 750.
 
You'll have a lot more fish options if you go with the 6 foot tank.
 
You could run 4 foot lights on the 5 foot tank. But not the 6 foot tank.
Myself, I want a 6 foot but I need a house first and the market sucks. I can fit a 5 foot in my current space. I'm trying so hard to wait and it's been a couple years now. I have been upgrading gear to handle a 6 foot tank. Anyway...
I would do as big as you can handle and have the space for.
 
Bigger is better, at least that's what Ive heard lol. If you have room definatly go bigger. The extra length will allow you to add fish that may need more swim room if that is an interest. May need an additional light but other than that other equipment will be about the same. I'm from the camp that too much is just enough.
 
I would go thr 180. The height and depth is great at shaping. It will also get you into bigger tangs more fish and just more scaping options.
 
180 for sure. I did not love my 120 like I thought I would. 4 foot limits fish choices pretty severely IMO.

Get the 6 footer and 1 extra light. Upkeep will cost slightly more but not terrible
 
I’m currently looking to upgrade to what I am hoping to consider my “dream build” and one that will last a long time.

I’m torn between 120g, 150, and 180. (4x2x2, 5x2x2, or 6x2x2)

Are the gear requirements for these 3 systems pretty similar (In terms of flow and other equipment)? I’d like to run a mixed reef with a decent amount of sps near the top level of the system.

Any insight is appreciated!

Obviously the lighting would be different, but the size of equipment else wise won't be dramatically different. I think a 6ft tank is very nice
 
The biggest you can get!
I’m very happy with my 500g (6’x5’) tank, but had the steel support columns been placed differently. I’d have been closer to 700g+
 
Personally 120, but I am a bad American as I don’t think bigger is better automatically!

really it’s a question for you and the how you think the space will look. I simply didn’t like a 6’ tank and wouldn’t take one for free over a 4’ tank.
 
Go big or go home….. you will always wish you had a larger tank in a few years as the corals grow out. This is not a cheap hobby but there are good deals out there on the used equipment. Start shopping and get some good deals for your dream tank
 
I would recommend getting the shape that you want first peninsula vs standard, then the bracing or rimless based on preference… and then go as big as possible
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top