The problem is that we are once again trusting vendors rather than doing good analytical science. The vendors have given us little or no reason to accept that their device’s ammonia readings are close to what they really are.
Why do you think vendors do not supply customers with data that supports the claims for their devices? And why do you suppose the vendors do not supply a reference solution or directions for testing their devices? The answer is partly practical. Their customers don’t care, so, why bother. The other part of the answer is that the data would likely raise more questions about the claims than support the claims.
Brandon, you are tempting me to buy this thing and put it through a battery of tests. But maybe we could just get
@Rick Mathew to put testing his Seneye on his “to do” list and save me $200