I respectfully disagree, due to work I am doing with the FWC and a few colleges in regards to anemone reproduction.
While not the typical aiptasia we see, they are currently listed under the genus as an aiptasia sp. and very closely resemble Aiptasia mutabilis when you look at all of the features of that specific anemone.
As with all things, it could be reclassified at a later date, but for now, that is what it falls under.
its not a major problem nem or invasive like indo nems you get as pests on coral frags. As I said.. it is not the typical aiptasia we think of as a bad guy (I am pretty sure you also said this). Yes there are relatives but saying it is aiptasia, burn it with fire gives the wrong impression of what they are dealing with.
Last edited:

I guess that sort of behavior spills into forums though
Lets not make that the new normal peoples!

