This is a very common occurrence during the night cycle on a tank without algae filtration, & why pH falls - biological processes of photosynthesis are the opposite when light isn't provided. Photosynthesising organisms in the display - corals, algae, cyano, dinos, diatoms, respire carbon dioxide, along with fish & other organisms.
When ambient air co2 is higher than fresh air levels a skimmer for sure increases the co2 content of water because the co2 is being aggressively forced into the water via bubbles. The interaction via the air-water interface by a scrubber however is passive, & during photosynthesis what ever level of co2 does cross over into the water is used by the algae, as I've already pointed out.
It seems you have made up your mind on this subject, so I'll leave it at that.
Steve,
I havent made up my mind at all.
I'm searching for answers, regardless of what "I" (or anyone else) want the answers to be.
I've already stated several times in this thread that I'm hoping an ATS fills my needs. An ATS would better suit my space requirements than a chaeto refugium would. The cost between the two will be about the same, (commercial ATS vs purchasing refugium light such as the Kessil H380), but the fuge would take up more space.
I have two requirements: NO3/PO4 reduction and pH bump. And I'm not even sure if the two are actually compatible for my planned system due to size.
I'm going to have a total system volume of 60 gallons or under, with as heavy a bioload as I can manage (space) in order to increase PO4/NO3 availability.
With my system being in the basement, and the fact that I know CO2 collects there, I have to be mindful of handling it.
I also have to be mindful of whatever system I use, (ATS or Chaeto fuge) being more than capable of stripping NO3/PO4 from the water to unhealthy levels to the point that I may not be able to run it daily as I'd like.
So, like everything else in this hobby, it's a juggling act.
To that end, I'm searching for answers and wanting to find out more.
I've never used an ATS, but I'm ignorant of them, nor am I against using one, if it turns out to be the best thing for my system.
I was rather hoping you'd continue the discussion as you appear to be quite knowledgeable about ATS. I'm not married to one method or another, I can be swayed. But I'm unwilling to jump off a cliff based on the one or two posts by someone on the internet without sufficient information/science to back it up.
If you chose to leave the conversation, that's entirely up to you. I'll continue my search elsewhere, and eventually find the answers I'm looking for.
For example...How much contact time does the algae in the ATS need in order to pull CO2 from it? Can you definitively state, (and cite) that the algae is only using CO2 from the water and not the ambient air?
C'mon man, convince me?
I want to use an ATS, but I just need more info!