the scrubber you’re looking at buying also doesn’t have anywhere near the capacity a diy cheato reactor has. More capacity=more nutrient export.
Hi 45ZoaGarden;
The necessary capacity is determined by the amount of food fed to the aquarium. The scrubber
@CavalierReef is looking at may have more than enough capacity for his system.
(1). Cheato is much more efficient than a scrubber
(2). Cheato is a VERY aggressive form of algae and will starve out ANY other algae. Something hair algae in a scrubber won’t do.
(1). Lets begin by defining what type of algae typically grows (self seeds) on a
mature scrubber screen. In my experience it is typically one or more species of Ulva (excluding lettuce leaf Ulva) and
isn't what most people recognise as "green hair algae" (GHA) that infestates aquascapes in displays, is a broad term that covers hundreds of species of green filamentous algae, simple species that tend to be fine in texture and have few distinguishable features. True species level identification requires a microscope.
Now
, chaeto is an effective macro for filtration because it grows quickly. But Ulva typically grows faster still and the faster an algae grows the faster the assimilation of in-organic nutrients. So, the faster the growth, the greater the filtering efficiency.
Enteromorpha (Ulva)
Compressa, Linnaeus, prolifera or intestinalis ???
A benefit of a scrubbers algae is that it has 'self seeded'. It has grown from available spores of algae already in a system
when an ideal environment for it to grow is provided. People 'add' chaeto to their system & often it dies no matter what they do, & then they give up on it.
(2). I would argue that any person who has suffered a GHA infestation in their display know that GHA is very aggressive algae also, especially when GHA starts growing all over the chaeto they have in a fuge or reactor, killing the chaeto. ;Blackeye
As for Ulva on a scrubber screen it certainly will starve out ANY other algae Chaeto does. There is no reason why any other fast growing algae used for filtration couldn't.
If scrubbers are better then cheato, why does 99% of today’s reefers use Fuges to grow cheato instead of saving on space with the sump to have a scrubber?
This is a baseless claim. No accurate figure could ever be obtained. Fuges are popular for various reasons. The Triton Method. A perception of simplicity & inexpensiveness. The ability to keep other organisms in the fuge (a micro ecosystem). In any case, there could be a thousand algae fuge set-ups to every scrubber,,, but that wouldn't prove that scrubbers are less effecient!
Algae isn’t very efficient in lowering phosphates.
I do have a gfo reactor running 24/7 to keep the phosphates down below .05
This is incorrect. Algae growing efficiently assimilates both in-organic nitrogen & phosphate as a consequence of photosynthesis. I can easily run a longer photo-period & zero out PO4. I need to dose PO4 rather than use GFO, which I never have needed to. Perhaps Chaeto is not as effective as my scrubber's Ulva at utilising PO4?
ABSTRACT
The nutrients uptake and the growth of Ulva. lactuca in Mugil cephalus wastewater (WW) were evaluated and compared with U. lactuca cultivated in estuarine water (EW)... The uptake of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and dissolved inorganic phosphorous (DIP), as well as the biomass yield and specific growth rate of U. lactuca, were assessed every two days... This study demonstrates the efficiency of U. lactuca in the assimilation of DIN and DIP from M. cephalus WW, contributing to reduce the release of dissolved inorganic nutrients in the natural environment.
reactors are completely dus one table with the unplugging of a pump and removing of one tube. Just saying LOL
I'm assuming here you suggest that servicing a scrubber is much more involved than servicing your reactor?
It all depends on design of course. I design & build my own scrubbers, & one design feature is, I can clean a scrubber screen without removing the unit or pulling it to pieces, without turning off the pump & undoing pipes, and replace the cleaned screen within 60 seconds.
In any case, if maintenance is such a chore for a person, perhaps they should buy a robot dog instead.
Cheers, & happy new year ;Joyful