- Joined
- May 6, 2020
- Messages
- 448
- Reaction score
- 448
- Location
- NYC
- What state or country do you live in
- New York
Ive seen you mention in other posts that a 1dkh raise in alk equals about 7ppm raise in calcium.
I'm wondering if ph also plays into this? I've just started dosing my system to follow the dsr ez method about 6 days ago. Currently only dosing the ph/alk buffer and the carbon solution. Day 1 i tested my system at 7.3 dkh, 454ppm calcium and 8.1ph.
I dosed the alk/ph ez-buffer for 6 days, which i assume is just kalk or probably two part alk solution since you don't have to stir it,, trying to bring it up to 8.4dkh. today i tested everything again after all doses made i am at 7.9dkh and 8.2ph, assuming my results are off from deviations of total volume calculation and not knowing my daily consumption yet.
But now my calcium has raised to 466ppm without dosing any calcium or trace elements. With your estimation, i should be at 458ppm for calcium as a result of raising the alk through dosing. Is there something else like the extra 0.1ph raised that would also increase calcium without dosing? Or is this just within the range of accuracy for the hanna calcium checker? I'm assuming I'm slightly inaccurate with the digital checker because there is always the slightest amount of pigment dust that doesn't quite make it into the vial from the part b packet.
I'm wondering if ph also plays into this? I've just started dosing my system to follow the dsr ez method about 6 days ago. Currently only dosing the ph/alk buffer and the carbon solution. Day 1 i tested my system at 7.3 dkh, 454ppm calcium and 8.1ph.
I dosed the alk/ph ez-buffer for 6 days, which i assume is just kalk or probably two part alk solution since you don't have to stir it,, trying to bring it up to 8.4dkh. today i tested everything again after all doses made i am at 7.9dkh and 8.2ph, assuming my results are off from deviations of total volume calculation and not knowing my daily consumption yet.
But now my calcium has raised to 466ppm without dosing any calcium or trace elements. With your estimation, i should be at 458ppm for calcium as a result of raising the alk through dosing. Is there something else like the extra 0.1ph raised that would also increase calcium without dosing? Or is this just within the range of accuracy for the hanna calcium checker? I'm assuming I'm slightly inaccurate with the digital checker because there is always the slightest amount of pigment dust that doesn't quite make it into the vial from the part b packet.



