Ammonia for artificial bioload?

thejuggernaut

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
376
Reaction score
27
Location
Houston
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been wanting to run some test to figure out the efficiency of several different types of filtration. Cheato (under different types of lighting), ATS, Marinepure Blocks. I would like to be able to precisely introduce a specific amount of nutrients that I can measure. That way I could make sure the tests are consistent across all the test systems. My questions is, will ammonia alone be enough to simulate a real bio load. I know it will be broken down to nitrite and nitrate, but will I need something else to produce phosphates. Would it just be better to measure out and dose the same amounts of raw food instead? The problem I see with food is it building up in the bottom of the tank with nothing to eat it, and it start producing nutrients on a exponential scale. That is why I thought a clean ammonia source would be a better solution. Thoughts, suggestions?!
 
You definite to keep many thing controlled, not just phosphate, but trace elements as well, such as iron.

It's a bit if a tricky project for that reason, and simply picking a normal husbandry routine (foods, additives, etc.) might be best.
 
Yea,

Maybe if I puree it into a fine mush, it will be decomposed in a quicker more controllable manner. Maybe there is a reason nobody really ever does it. There is just so much anecdotal information out there on everything, I was wanting to get some hard numbers. While they may not be perfect, they would be better than what I can find. Thanks for your responses.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top