On seneye if working correctly this reading would have been an acceptable range of .00x-.00x in the thousandths ppm nh3, not tenths.
My chemistry friends have reminded me that even the stated readings above must be divided out in something called tan conversion in order to reflect nh3, the only form of ammonia we care about. On this kit above after tan we're at least in .0x hundredths ppm range, considered safe. The day it hits .2 for real, total Wipeout w be reported its unsustainable
Free ammonia tracing after cycle completes is easy, it will never be a case of being uncycled.
Homework for us all: I don't know which is more rapidly uptaken in reefing, oxygen or ammonia. Tough call
Ammonia is for sure in the top two rates of turnover for params we can measure. if it is even handled faster/ more units per second than oxygen I'll not be surprised, nothing above thousandths ppm is going on post cycle.
Ammonia is never left unused by bacteria, too valuable as substrate for metabolic machinery
that's why every system is always ammonia compliant, it's always a mis test going on. I've never seen a single outlier accurately shown, on verified working seneye.
I would like to know rates of consumption vs production for oxygen vs free ammonia nh3 in marine systems, that will show a neat perspective
