Barium trace element

Smallslandreefer

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
May 11, 2022
Messages
89
Reaction score
21
Location
Cyprus
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I did some research on Barium’s benefits as a trace element and the draw backs from it being deficient. I found out that some people believe barium has no benefits at all at any level and it can possibly be harmful at high levels. Some reefers also might be mislead from barium being beneficial when they dose supplements with strontium and barium which actually is the strontium that has the beneficial effects. As for barium being deficient i couldn't find any Direct correlation to harming corals or the reef in general.Many reef aquarium companies state benefits of barium but i haven't seen any scientific data specifically on barium (i am sure it has something to do with marketing & sales for there products). I do know that barium is present in corals however that doesn't make liable for dosing it.
Any opinions on Barium? Does any reef organism utilise or benefit from barium?
 
Here is a good thread that likely talks about it

 
Here is a good thread that likely talks about it

Excellent thanks
 
Just to reiterate my barium comments from that thread, barium has no known biological need in any organism (although one algae is known to store barium sulfate). I would not bother dosing it, but if for some reason you want to, it should be fine at natural levels.
 
Just to reiterate my barium comments from that thread, barium has no known biological need in any organism (although one algae is known to store barium sulfate). I would not bother dosing it, but if for some reason you want to, it should be fine at natural levels.
What about nickel as a trace element. Fro example my reef has very very low traces 0,4 ug/l is that enough to benefits from its properties on enzymes or a certain level should be reached?
 
Nickel is a required trace element. There’s very little useful info available on optimal levels, and there will be different chemical forms of nickel in seawater so a single number is an oversimplification anyway, but 0.4 ug/L is only a little below the ocean average of 0.7 ug/L and it may be plenty.
 
Nickel is a required trace element. There’s very little useful info available on optimal levels, and there will be different chemical forms of nickel in seawater so a single number is an oversimplification anyway, but 0.4 ug/L is only a little below the ocean average of 0.7 ug/L and it may be plenty.
You are an encyclopaedia. Respect
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top