Advice on if the community thinks a kessil a160 is sufficient enough light to keep and grow lps corals. Doing great on my 14 but with coral growth might need to upgrade to a 29
I have a Biocube 32 with the Kessil 360we. While it is a nice light it does not put out a ton of PAR. At 40% color and 75% intensity I’m getting 175 par. I would suggest the 360x or we vs the 160. Just my 2c.. happy reefing!
I had a single 160 on my 29 biocube for about a year and a half and never had problems with my lps corals. Branching hammer, trumpets and blastos did well. My sps never seemed happy though. I now have two a160wes that ramp up to 91 percent intensity and 65 percentage color and my sps are doing great. The two light sources help to minimize shadowing. I also know someone personally that used 2 a160s along with 2 t5s on a 40 breeder that did great for 3 years. He now uses 3 a160s and t5s on a 4’ 80 gallon shallow reef and is having great success. They are nice little lights if you stick with shallow reefs and use multiple light sources.
Question, been watching tons of reviews on the ai prime 16hd. Debating on another kessil on top of what I have or getting the prime. 1 or 2 would be sufficient? Seen a video of a guy only having one prime hooked up to his 29