BRS GFO ver Seachem PhosGuard

i was wondering the same thing i changed over to phosgaurd (seachem) from gfo. i have GHA in my sump nut not in my tank at all.
 
I have used both products with great success, however BRS bulk GFO will save you money. They have an excellent line of products.
 
I have used both products with great success, however BRS bulk GFO will save you money. They have an excellent line of products.

I'd have to agree 100% both are good products and I have used both with success and no big downsides over the years. In my experience, the advantage of GFO is cost and less frequent changes. Phosguard may be a little better at absorbing silicates (new systems, new plastic equipment) and phosguard seems to do better without a reactor. With both, I sometimes worry about metals being leached into my system - iron by GFO, aluminum by phosguard, but I think this is a minimal risk if used properly.
 
I was using the brs - then switched to tlf phosban, they both work well
 
i use gfo and am currently trying to find a way to use it without stripping po4 to 0. right now i am trying to use it on a timer
 
I'd have to agree 100% both are good products and I have used both with success and no big downsides over the years. In my experience, the advantage of GFO is cost and less frequent changes. Phosguard may be a little better at absorbing silicates (new systems, new plastic equipment) and phosguard seems to do better without a reactor. With both, I sometimes worry about metals being leached into my system - iron by GFO, aluminum by phosguard, but I think this is a minimal risk if used properly.

chemistry books say Iron won't get into water column
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top