BTA condition steadily declining since introducing

AndyR83

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
64
Reaction score
43
Location
Northern RI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Situation:
This BTA looked decent at first, but has steadily declined during the time I have had it in my tank. I initially thought I may just need to give it some time to adjust since I’ve read they tend to exhibit odd behaviors periodically, but it hasn’t rebounded. It now looks significantly worse.

Background:
The nem was purchased from PetCo about 10 weeks ago. The tank it came from wasn’t particularly appropriate for a BTA (weak lighting and not much water flow) but I didn’t think it looked much worse for the wear so I decided to take a chance on it. It picked a spot high in the tank with strong lighting and water flow on the first day it was added and has remained there ever since. I initially fed it mysis once or twice per week which it readily accepted. It gets some attention from my domino and frosty clown occasionally, but I definitely wouldn’t say this behavior occurs regularly enough to call it “hosting.”

Over the past month and a half, I’ve seen a marked decrease in its color. It now appears bleached to me. Its tentacles are also very short and stubby and it appears deflated about 75% of the time. I thought these may be signs of starvation, especially since bleaching may have occurred. Suspecting this, I increased feeding attempts to daily or every other day. It frequently will not accept food at this point, instead leaving the mysis in its mouth loosely for a few minutes until it floats away and demonstrating no effort whatsoever to eat

Initial Picture:
141E44C3-6A8B-4557-9A94-D83F6B7FE33A.png


6-7 weeks after adding:
B546885B-F7F3-42E3-ACE9-C777E7263D82.png


Current state (10 weeks after adding)
15DBA0EC-B593-4CEA-A1B4-C1C21EF0CCA9.jpeg


Current state under blue lights (included to demonstrate lack of fluorescence):
F835D87D-4C74-4319-98DF-38F2409A008D.jpeg



Assessment:
  • Tank age is approximately 8 months
  • Parameters are closely monitored and very stable.
  • 55 gallons of RO/DI filtered well water prepared with Instant Ocean reef crystals
  • Lighting includes two fixtures that are run simultaneously:
    • Current USA Marine Orbit LED 46 watt
    • Fluval Sea Marine & Reef 3.0 LED 59 wayt
  • Last partial water change (approximately 50%) performed 8 days ago
  • Copepods added about every 4 - 6 weeks
  • 20ml Oceanmagik phytoplankton daily
  • Temp 77 - 78F
  • Salinity 1.023 - 1.024SG
  • pH 8.1 - 8.2
  • Ammonia 0ppm
  • Nitrite 0ppm
  • Nitrate 0 - 10ppm
  • Alkalinity 13-15dKH
  • Calcium 420-440ppm
Tank Mates include:
  • Blue Damsel
  • Cloudy Damsel
  • Domino Damsel
  • Two Stripe Damsel
  • Yellowtail Damsel
  • Diamond Watchman Goby
  • Mandarin Dragonet
  • Frosty Clownfish
  • Bennett’s Pufferfish
  • Rose Bubble Tip Anemone (which is thriving)
  • Turbo Snails
  • Hermit Crabs
  • Emerald Crab
  • Peppermint Shrimp
  • Various Zoas
  • Alveopora
  • Leptoseris

I’m wondering if the change in lighting may have been the root cause of this situation. I welcome any insight and recommendations this group may have to share.

Thanks in advance!
 
It's bleached and starving. Alkalinity is pretty high, and lighting likely isn't sufficient. How big is your tank?
 
I am not an expert by any means but I definitely does not look well. I would guess the light is likely not strong enough for it.
 
It’s a 55 gallon tank.

I’ve been monitoring the alkalinity closely for a while. It’s coming down slowly but surely. I’m not sure why it was elevated in the first place, but it has been for quite a while. I can’t point to any obvious reason. I haven’t been dosing anything for pH or KH. Is this level too high to be attributed to the nature of the groundwater in the northeast US?

Regarding lighting, I’m surprised to hear these fixtures may be inadequate. The nem is 7” below the surface. Based on their spec sheets, the Orbit light should be providing about 90-100 PAR at this depth and the Fluval should be significantly more (specs say 381 PAR at 3” depth and 94 PAR at 12”.)

I have another light that’s much more powerful but I’ve held off using it because I thought it would be too much for this tank. I’m planning on moving up to a 125 gallon in the near future and I picked this fixture up recently to use when that happens. It’s a 12-bulb T5HO (6x 39-watt ATI bulbs of various wavelengths per side.) In it’s current state, I was afraid this light would fry the nem to a crisp.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top