Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
which is better and why?
2 part is much easier IMO and set up cost can be half of what a full calcium system would beDosing is easier to set up and doesn't require a CO2 tank.

If your going all out SPS on your 150 then a cal reactor could be a good choice. You need to know what your getting into and how to run one.I'm Leaning towards a calcium reactor for my system. My tank is a 150 gal system. So do you guys think a calcium reactor would be better for a system of my size. Or should would a two part system be ok? I'm Asking this so I can be a part of the conversation. I hope you guys don't mind.

No worries abut hijacking. The more questions the more we all learn.Thanks I just didn't want to seem like I was hijacking the thread. My ph is very consistent,it runs around 8.2 to 8.3 with out changing from day to day.

I compare the pros and cons of all the basic methods of supplementing calcium and alkalinity here:
The Many Methods for Supplementing Calcium and Alkalinity - REEFEDITION
https://www.reef2reef.com/blog/the-many-methods-for-supplementing-calcium-and-alkalinity
Good read. So if I'm reading this right my 180gal mixed reef would do best with a reactor?

I wouldn't conclude that. I used limewater for 20 years in a mixed reef, and a two part is also a good choice.![]()

