I guess it's the same argument with driving a car. If you accelerate, then coast, are you saving gas? As opposed to just keeping the accelerator pedal steady to maintain speed. In my mind, you are dumping in a bunch of CO2 to reach a low pH, then coasting until it raises again. Then you open the valve and dump a bunch of CO2 in again.... Would it really be any different than if the reactor maintained a constant pH and flow with steady CO2 input? To be honest, I don't know the answer to that question. Are you essentially adding the exact same amount of CO2 as you would if it was just a steady flow? Interesting question and I just don't have enough data to say one way or another which way is better. It is my guess that in the end, both methods probably use the same amount of CO2.