Can I go skimmerless?

Johnnyredd

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
84
Reaction score
2
Location
Southaven, MS
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Building a 125 reef.

It will only house a carpet nem, pair of saddlebacks, 6 line Wrasse and maybe another fish or two. Minimal fish, nothing big. As I work on sump/fuge design I have come across a few ideas and wanted to pass this along and see if anyone thought good or bad.

Make the sump a dual fuge. One side Chaeto and other macro algae. The other side Xenia. Each overflow feeds an end of the fuge. The return would be in the middle. (because I want it there if for no other reason)

If I do this do I really need a skimmer? It will already be a minimal bioload so would I starve the Xenia using a skimmer?
 
I don't think you would starve the Xenia by going with a skimmer. But I also don't think you absolutely have to have a skimmer if you don't want to. As long as you keep up with WC's, Gfo/carbon, and fuge you should be ok.
 
There is a thread on reef central about a xenia fuge and it mentions how the skimmer has to be limited because it competes with the xenia for nutrients.
I think this will work but its the first 3 to 6 months that worries me - the time it will take to establish my xenia and macro algae colonies.
 
I've had several skimmerless tanks and it never works out for me. Not saying it can't be done but I can't pull it off.
 
i've been running with a really crappy protein skimmer for years...if i clean it real good it will run for 2 weeks then stop functioning properly....i clean it every 3-4 months with my fuge with cheato. but i have minimal bioload, 6 fish no longer than 1 1/4 inch. i think i feed my corals more than my fish...BUT every tank setup works differently, i've worked my way into this setup over 7 years...

Also, i might be wrong on this but i thought xenia sucked up some other nutrients besides nitrates. I was thinking about that idea and passed on it after reading up.

Good luck either way
 
I have not found a down side to xenia yet but as with my post here i am still lookimg. I expect to be dosing since its a reef and expect the macro algae side of the fuge to pull its weight, also. I just want the water as clean as possible as naturally as possible.
 
If you ran a big enough ATS (algae turf scrubber) you could run skimmerless. These pull more weight than chaeto or caulerpa.
 
I really have not seen an ats design that peaked my interest but i have also yet to find anything negative on a xenia and chaeto combo fuge. I may leave my little aquamedic turboflotor 500 skimmer on it. We have a lot of anthelia in the 55 with the clowns, 6 line. Crystal clear water and very minimal skimmate. That why i think the same bioload on a 125 with a two chamber fuge will be fine.

If not... Add a skimmer later.
 
My system was skimmerless for about 4 months. A 9"X9" waterfall algae scrubber kept nitrates at zero despite ten 2.5" fish. I added a skimmer to pull green tint out of the water.
 
What kind of carpet anemone? They are really sensitive especially gigs...
Could you sure but expect more water changes and less piece of mind.
 
Depends. You might be fine. Although I have heard carpet nems tend to put off a lot of crap into the water column.

I have two clowns and a dottyback. I run skimmerless. Filter pad, carbon/gfo, purigen, small bag of petco zeolite, and recently a bit of chaeto.

I am able to keep acros wit this setup. FWIW
 
Everything will do a lot better if you do. Looking at all of the nasty skim mate mine pulls out every day makes me wonder how bad of shape I would be in without it
 
My skimmer has been off for two weeks. I have noticed an accelerated growth rate of the anethelia and GSP after about 3 days. Water is crystal clear and tested great last Sunday.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top