Canister Filters?
- Thread starter Kasey Grohowski
- Start date
- Tagged users None
sfin52
So many pedestrians so little time
I use the fluval fx4
Kasey Grohowski
Valuable Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2019
- Messages
- 1,113
- Reaction score
- 391
As your main filtration?
sfin52
So many pedestrians so little time
Tiger Brown
Well-Known Member
Yes, I run a Fluval as my main filtration on a 55 gallon tank. Many of us do, many will tell you they are nitrate factories to be avoided, that is hogwash. As long as you are diligent about cleaning/changing media they will serve you well.
NorCal Reefer
Community Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2019
- Messages
- 86
- Reaction score
- 357
Same here. I run a fluval fx4 and a HOB skimmer on my 75 gal sps dominated tank. Don’t skip maintenance and you will be fine.
Crossfire
Community Member
I use one as well- eheim pro 4+. It works great for mechanical filtration. It's also a great place to throw in some carbon or other media. The key is maintenance like the last post said. Keep it clean.
I use a protein skimmer as well.
I use a protein skimmer as well.
Peace River
Thrive Master
Staff member
Super Moderator
Reef Squad
Reef Squad Leader
Partner Member 2024
Excellence Award
Article Contributor
Hospitality Award
Article Administrator
Reef Pumpkin Carver
I will add to the “don’t skip the maintenance” theme.
The issue is this: they're aerobic. Sole function is ammonia filtration, these filters add oxygen competing bac to a system that runs fine without them. Your ammonia is zero with or without them
Why use them in reefing, then? Sole target of all high surface area aerobic filters is ammonia, solely. Your tank handles all ammonia the same, without them, and in a power outage these become a concentrated liability.
Oxygenation=same as above, not running low on o2, and you're adding oxygen competing bac that take it from your system.
The only time these filters are used accurately is in the presence of such bioload that free ammonia results without them
Additionally, using them as GFO or biopellet reactors or carbon filtration is legit, since the target isn't ammonia which was fine when cycling completed with or without extra surface area added after. Carbon filtration for water clarity/legit use. Must keep clean of detritus to retain benefits.
They’re totally unharmful to use. Any tank here can connect three extra canister filters and it will not harm anything at all. Measurable params remain same with zero or with three running
*the fact you can instantly remove an aerobic filter (or sandbed
) immediately in a reef tank and nothing is lacking regarding filtration surface area is a neat way to measure their redundancy.
Why use them in reefing, then? Sole target of all high surface area aerobic filters is ammonia, solely. Your tank handles all ammonia the same, without them, and in a power outage these become a concentrated liability.
Oxygenation=same as above, not running low on o2, and you're adding oxygen competing bac that take it from your system.
The only time these filters are used accurately is in the presence of such bioload that free ammonia results without them
Additionally, using them as GFO or biopellet reactors or carbon filtration is legit, since the target isn't ammonia which was fine when cycling completed with or without extra surface area added after. Carbon filtration for water clarity/legit use. Must keep clean of detritus to retain benefits.
They’re totally unharmful to use. Any tank here can connect three extra canister filters and it will not harm anything at all. Measurable params remain same with zero or with three running
*the fact you can instantly remove an aerobic filter (or sandbed
) immediately in a reef tank and nothing is lacking regarding filtration surface area is a neat way to measure their redundancy.
Last edited:
