Or both pretty evenly?
Reason I ask, is my tank has chronically low phosphate and has for a couple years. I don't run any phosphate removers, I do run a refugium. I struggle to get my phosphate over .03 and usually it's .01-.02. If I feed more, I just get more algae growth. The tank is 90% acropora, they seem happy but the colors are a bit pale and I wouldn't mind a bit faster growth. Nitrate is typically between 5 and 8. A couple weeks ago I brought the 'fuge lighting period down from 14 hours to 10, with little change thus far. The chaeto actually seems healthier and greener now, lol. I keep my chaeto ball small as well, between baseball and volleyball size.
So... Should I continue to bring the photoperiod down to maybe six hours? I'd hate to give up the overnight ph benefit but I don't really know any other way to do this other than very slowly ramping up feeding but that will take a couple months at least. I'd also prefer not to add any more fish. Should I do fewer water changes? (doing 10% per week).
Thanks
Reason I ask, is my tank has chronically low phosphate and has for a couple years. I don't run any phosphate removers, I do run a refugium. I struggle to get my phosphate over .03 and usually it's .01-.02. If I feed more, I just get more algae growth. The tank is 90% acropora, they seem happy but the colors are a bit pale and I wouldn't mind a bit faster growth. Nitrate is typically between 5 and 8. A couple weeks ago I brought the 'fuge lighting period down from 14 hours to 10, with little change thus far. The chaeto actually seems healthier and greener now, lol. I keep my chaeto ball small as well, between baseball and volleyball size.
So... Should I continue to bring the photoperiod down to maybe six hours? I'd hate to give up the overnight ph benefit but I don't really know any other way to do this other than very slowly ramping up feeding but that will take a couple months at least. I'd also prefer not to add any more fish. Should I do fewer water changes? (doing 10% per week).
Thanks

