Crazy Alk/CA consumption, looking for suggestions

nero0762

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 16, 2016
Messages
61
Reaction score
30
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've got a Red Sea Reefer 425XL (88gal display, 24gal sump) that's consuming what I think are crazy amounts of 2-part.
First, a little context... the tank is just under 1 year old. We started the tank with sterilized (bleached) rock, and "live" sand.
We've got a few fish:
- 2 medium clownfish
- 1 small mandarin
- 1 medium watchman goby
- 1 small hippo tang
There are a few inverts:
- 1 peppermint shrimp
- 1 blood fire shrimp
- 1 pistol shrimp
- 1 rock flower anemone
- 1 condy anemone
And we've got an assortment of coral, mostly frags
- Various polyps, most are still small colonies (< 5 heads), and one larger colony (a little smaller than a tennis ball)
- Lavender/green mushroom (a little smaller than a tennis ball)
- 4 or 5 tiny, miscellaneous mushrooms (all smaller than a quarter)
- Flower pot, on the smaller side (ping pong ball sized)
- Dendro, single head
- War coral, doesn't quite cover a single plug
- Orange/Green Blastomussa, doesn't quite cover a single plug
- Yellow/green trumpet coral with 6 small heads
- Purple/Green Blastomussa, doesn't quite cover a single plug
- ~5 small acans, each fits on a single plug
- 2 Hammer corals, one about the size of a tennis ball, one the size of a ping-pong ball
- 1 Stylophora Coral, about 3" tall, 2 "heads"
- 3 Birdsnest frags, all about 3" tall (and growing quickly)
- 1 purple montipora, about 2" in diameter
In the tank we run filter socks, an algae scrubber, a skimmer, and 2 powerheads. We use Red Sea Coral Pro salt, and change ~ 10% weekly. All the water is RODI.
We have coralline algae growing in the tank, primarily on the rocks in patches about the size of a quarter, and I'd guess its covering 10-15% of the visible rock surface (we keep the glass clean).
Now, to the most interesting bit.... I started with Kalkwasser in the ATO. After running that for 3-4 months, I concluded that it couldn't keep up with the demand, so we switched to 2-part. We use the BRS bulk stuff. The doser is a home-made rig using cheap dosing heads from Amazon and controlled by our Apex. I know what you're thinking, but so far this rig is working very nicely, and consistently puts out 1ml/sec (I test the output regularly since I know I'm using cheap parts). I mix the 2-part per the BRS instructions.
Here's where is gets strange... we've been trying to maintain Ca at 420, and dKH between 9.0 and 9.2. I'm dosing 10ml of Alk every 30 mins (480 ml/day) and 9ml of Ca every 30 min (432 ml/day) and I still need to top off manually every few days to get things back to the desired levels (they're off by about 10%). Each part is dosed 15 mins apart to minimize precipitation, and they're dropped directly into a powerhead so its pretty quickly dispersed. I haven't noticed and precipitation or build up in the display, but my heater (in the sump) does get buildup (Ca, I assume?).
For testing, I use a Hanna checker for dKH. I've cross checked it with another test, and they're pretty consistent. I also often check the dKH twice with the Hanna as I've read posts about it being inconsistent (FWIW, it reads the same on consecutive tests). And I use the Red Sea Pro for Ca. None of the test reagents are expired

So, thinking this through, I'm trying to identify the "problem". Here are potential sources and how I'm trying to eliminate them:
- My readings are off... This seems unlikely as I often test twice and get consistent results. And I occasionally use different test kits with similar results.
- My doser isn't working correctly. As mentioned above, I occasionally check it output. And, my reservoirs are emptying as expected in correlation with the amount I think I'm doing.
- The 2-part isn't as "potent" as it should be... This has been going on for ~6 months, so I've gone through several containers of 2-part powder, and the mixing instructions are pretty simple... 2-cups/gal for Alk, 2.5 cups/gal for CA. I've considered testing the potency of the solution by adding a few ml to a large volume of water and seeing if the numbers work out as expected, but haven't done it yet.
- Things are precipitating out... I'm not sure how to test this. I will say that when I top off manually, when I test the water 30 mins later, the numbers are roughly where I'd expect them to be. I'm not sure how long precip would take, though.
- Consumption rate... lastly there's the chance that the tank is actually consuming all this Alk/Ca. I've tested consumption in the past by getting levels to where I want them, and stopping dosing for a period an re-testing. These tests have indicated that the consumption is occurring. In fact, I topped everything off last night (dKH 9.4, Ca 400 at 11pm). When I tested Alk at 9am this morning, it was 8.2. I'll continue to test (with no dosing) for the next day or so, but I don't want to let the levels fall too far.

So, here are my questions:
1. Am I missing another source of "error" in all this?
2. What other tests should I be running
3. Is it possible that the tank is consuming this much? We only have a few hard coral frags... Could it be the coralline algae?

Thanks in advance.
 
Something is off. Coralline algae can use a lot of carbonate alkalinity, but at 100g water volume, given your doses, your tank is consuming 50ppm Ca and 6.5 dKh per day. It seems unusual that your tank would consume this much in light of the stock list you provided.

Are you dosing the calcium and carbonate in the same location and at the same time? It's possible that calcium and carbonate are precipitating out because they're being dosed too close together.
 
Something is off. Coralline algae can use a lot of carbonate alkalinity, but at 100g water volume, given your doses, your tank is consuming 50ppm Ca and 6.5 dKh per day. It seems unusual that your tank would consume this much in light of the stock list you provided.

Are you dosing the calcium and carbonate in the same location and at the same time? It's possible that calcium and carbonate are precipitating out because they're being dosed too close together.

Thanks for confirming my suspicion (that this doesn't make sense).
Both parts are dosed in the same location, but its directly into a powerhead, and each dose is 15 mins apart. Alk is dosed on the hour and half hour, Ca is dosed 15 and 45 mins after the hour. The alk solution becomes visible when it hits the water (becomes cloudy on contact), so I can see the powerhead dispersing it. 90+% goes directly into the powerhead and pretty much invisible when it exits.
 
BRS now sells a couple of different ingredients for the two part (sodium bicarbonate and sodium carbonate). They have different potency. Can you give a link to the exact product you got?

Here's a copy and paste commentary from another person with a similar situation:

It is not uncommon to have substantial precipitation of calcium carbonate, especially in newer tanks with lots of raw calcium carbonate surfaces to nucleate more precipitation.

There are a lot of things that can be done to reduce precipitation, but the easiest is to lower the pH (use baking soda or a two part based on baking soda for alk, not a higher pH system based on carbonate) and to lower your alk goal for a while to let the precipitation surface "cool off" and get coated with the stuff that normally reduces precipitation (phosphate, organics, magnesium, etc.).

I'd target just 7.0 dKH for a while. Everything is fine at that alk, and consumption will be lower. When you do additions, add to a very high flow area (not into a powerhead, but maybe just after it). Don't dose next to a heater, since calcium carbonate will precipitate onto it.
 
BRS now sells a couple of different ingredients for the two part (sodium bicarbonate and sodium carbonate). They have different potency. Can you give a link to the exact product you got?
....
Randy, I'm using "Soda Ash" (here's the link), which I believe is sodium carbonate.

I like your suggestion of dropping the Alk for a while, and will start that right away. When you say "a while", what are you thinking? A few weeks, or months, or longer?

Should I still target 420 for the Ca?

And when you say "lower the pH", how low are you talking about? I expect by dialing back the alk target, that alone will drop the pH as the pH seems to rise when the soda ash is dosed.

Also, you say not to dose "into" the powerhead... I assume that's because its hard on the equipment?

Thanks for the help!
 
Its been 24 hours since I stopped dosing and I just tested Alk and Ca levels.
Alk is now 7.0 dKH, down from 9.4 yesterday at this time (validated with 2 kits)
Ca is at 400, exactly where is was yesterday... I wasn't expecting that.

I'm going to leave the dosers off for another 12 hours and test. If that Alk hasn't fallen much, I'll leave them off for 12 more hours and test. And then the delta between that reading and tonight's reading should help me determine what I should be dosing over 24 hours (since the Alk is currently at my new target, 7.0).
 
Randy, I'm using "Soda Ash" (here's the link), which I believe is sodium carbonate.

I like your suggestion of dropping the Alk for a while, and will start that right away. When you say "a while", what are you thinking? A few weeks, or months, or longer?

Should I still target 420 for the Ca?

And when you say "lower the pH", how low are you talking about? I expect by dialing back the alk target, that alone will drop the pH as the pH seems to rise when the soda ash is dosed.

Also, you say not to dose "into" the powerhead... I assume that's because its hard on the equipment?

Thanks for the help!

Switch to baking soda for a while. That gives the pH lowering. A week or two.

If you use other pH raising methods (like a CO2 scrubber) stop those too.

Dosing onto a warm object accelerates precipitation on/in it.
 
Just picked up the backing soda... I found "recipe #2" which suggests 1-1/8 cup of baking soda to 1 gallon of water. Will this give me the correct potency to continue dosing (roughly) 1:1 with the BRS calcium solution? Or, should I use a different amount of baking soda (or manage the 2 additives independently)?
 
Just picked up the backing soda... I found "recipe #2" which suggests 1-1/8 cup of baking soda to 1 gallon of water. Will this give me the correct potency to continue dosing (roughly) 1:1 with the BRS calcium solution? Or, should I use a different amount of baking soda (or manage the 2 additives independently)?

No, the raw baking soda recipe is half potency. Either dilute the calcium by a factor of 2, or dose half as much as the alk part. ;)

Recipes are here:

http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2006-02/rhf/index.php
 
Quick Update...
I started dosing baking soda as Randy suggested. With the Alk starting at 7.0, after dosing 7ml/hr for 24 hours (168 ml/day) the Alk was up to 7.8. As a reminder, I was dosing 480 ml/day of soda ash and the Alk was slowly dropping. So, with a 1/3 the amount of a mix that's half as potent, my Alk is rising.
My pH is a bit lower, averaging around 7.9 instead of 8.1, but that's noise in my book.

I'm going to drop the dosing a bit, as Randy suggested a target of 7.0 dKH. But this is already a huge improvement.
Thanks again, Randy!
 
I did not see it mentioned earlier in the thread, but I would suggest checking your Magnesium level as well. It can have a big impact on abiotic precipitation.

Dennis
 
Quick Update...
I started dosing baking soda as Randy suggested. With the Alk starting at 7.0, after dosing 7ml/hr for 24 hours (168 ml/day) the Alk was up to 7.8. As a reminder, I was dosing 480 ml/day of soda ash and the Alk was slowly dropping. So, with a 1/3 the amount of a mix that's half as potent, my Alk is rising.
My pH is a bit lower, averaging around 7.9 instead of 8.1, but that's noise in my book.

I'm going to drop the dosing a bit, as Randy suggested a target of 7.0 dKH. But this is already a huge improvement.
Thanks again, Randy!

Glad that helped! :)
 
I did not see it mentioned earlier in the thread, but I would suggest checking your Magnesium level as well. It can have a big impact on abiotic precipitation.

Dennis

Dennis, thanks for the reminder. I did check the Mg level a few days ago... it was 1220, so a little low, but not too far off.
 
Alk is now 7.0 dKH, down from 9.4 yesterday at this time (validated with 2 kits)
Ca is at 400, exactly where is was yesterday... I wasn't expecting that.

This is really surprising first time you see it, but don't forget that the changes are not proportional. For every 2.8 dKH drop in alk, calcium will only drop by 18 ppm (which is well below the reproducibility of most test kits.)
 
An update...
First, thanks again for all the suggestions, especially @Randy Holmes-Farley!
Alkalinity is now around 8.6 and still slowly rising, dosing 6ml/hr (144ml/day).
Ca is around 440ppm, dosing around 120ml/day. I'll probably dial this back just a bit.
This is around 1/3 of what I was dosing originally (and, technically 1/6 for the Alk, since its half as strong).
Oh, and pH is averaging 7.97 (+/- 0.08).
I consider this a win!
 
An update...
First, thanks again for all the suggestions, especially @Randy Holmes-Farley!
Alkalinity is now around 8.6 and still slowly rising, dosing 6ml/hr (144ml/day).
Ca is around 440ppm, dosing around 120ml/day. I'll probably dial this back just a bit.
This is around 1/3 of what I was dosing originally (and, technically 1/6 for the Alk, since its half as strong).
Oh, and pH is averaging 7.97 (+/- 0.08).
I consider this a win!

Great!

You're welcome and Happy Reefing. :)
 
@Randy Holmes-Farley, one more question for you...
You originally suggested that I run with baking soda for a few weeks. Is there a downside to sticking with it instead of switching back to soda ash?
The alkalinty is a little lower (averaging 8.0 with baking soda, vs 9.0 with soda ash), and the pH is roughly the same. (~ 8.0).
If I wanted to raise the alkalinity, could I just up the dose (of the baking soda) slightly?
 
@Randy Holmes-Farley, one more question for you...
You originally suggested that I run with baking soda for a few weeks. Is there a downside to sticking with it instead of switching back to soda ash?
The alkalinty is a little lower (averaging 8.0 with baking soda, vs 9.0 with soda ash), and the pH is roughly the same. (~ 8.0).
If I wanted to raise the alkalinity, could I just up the dose (of the baking soda) slightly?

The only substantial difference is the pH. If you are happy with the pH, it's fine to stick with baking soda. Upping the dose is fine. :)
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top