Lol.
this was a simple cycle fix among fixes.
there was no shred of doubt from DBurr or myself, the doubt came from you guys but I can understand why. It’s not like this was yours and my first disagreement, remember when the sand rinse thread was on page two and you were telling us how bad it was going to turn out
I don’t mind if you and I continually disagree, everyone needs a nemesis to provide motivation.
the jeers here about seneye: notice again they don’t come with any study links showing it’s consistent measure in reef tanks to be off; nobody popped in the 20 pages seneye+ ammonia dosing thread and said “hey you’re all shills and your device is wrong” lol
its perfectly fine by me jda if your best vitriol is reserved only for threads I do work in, you can tell it’s not going to stop the pages from compiling the same outcomes regardless of the subject matter. My main interest isn‘t arousing your ire, it’s adding to the pages and years of fixed tanks. I kind of baited you into that response above / admitted
try and move on from it now, no need to hold uber long term grudges.
old cycling rule adherents aren’t the meanest bunch in reefing by the way…am used to far worse accusation among logged outcomes. The worst reception in reefing history was posting about pico reefs back when only large tanks existed. Were it not for the throngs of peers in tow over the unfolding months and years after 2001, we’d all still be accused of photoshop, hidden plumbing and cheat camera tricks. After all, the sages of the day ruled out the possibility of pico reefs by posting peer-reviewed articles on coral allelopathy, and we all know how it goes down when the sages get challenged.
it is utmost fun shaking up the reef establishment from time to time, and logging the outcome patterns.