Wikipedia says its a member of the Faviidae Family but every seller/vendor I know lists it as an SPS. Why?
Cyphastrea LPS or SPS?
- Thread starter NanaReefer
- Start date
- Tagged users None
OP
OP
You didn't answer the question [emoji6]
Tab28
Valuable Member
It is a LPS. The large polyps each about 1/8" when open. I never considered it was a SPS even with the polyps closed. Nothing about it falls into sps category from what i can see. I think if a vendor listed it sps it is a compounding error or just in house error. I never saw it listed as sps at vendors i visit.
Rob Top1
Well-Known Member
If it mattered I would cast my vote as lps. Now the whole idea of lps and sps is simply a way the hobby has divided stony corals. Unless science has taken hold of this division recently it really only helps in locating a coral on some vendor website.
evolved
[email protected]
Excellence Award
Reef Tank 365
Expert Contributor
Article Contributor
Moderator Emeritus
AZ FRAG Member
Hospitality Award
My Tank Thread
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Messages
- 10,633
- Reaction score
- 11,986
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ
- What state or country do you live in
- Arizona
LPS & SPS is a hobbyst distinction; nothing scientific about it. It's simply classification by perceived polyp size. I argue the real intent of this classification is to group corals by what care they need; SPS = high light, high flow; LPS = low light, low flow.
If you just look at the polyp size, cyphastrea could be an SPS. But if you consider what it actually requires, LPS probably fits better.
If you just look at the polyp size, cyphastrea could be an SPS. But if you consider what it actually requires, LPS probably fits better.
KoleTang
Valuable Member
Cyphastrea is tricky because the polyps resemble SPS polyps, but they are much larger than any SPS polyp. It usually likes low light like an LPS, but there is a branching variation that resembles acropora that prefers higher light.
What we know:
- It doesn't fit perfectly in either of the hobbysist defined categories.
- it is classified in the Faviidae family (brain coral)
- There are at least two variations of growth to confuse things
We need to look at how Faviidae is described to understand why it is classified there: "Roundish, hemispherical, brain like" Faviidae I don't think an encrusting/branching coral fits here.
It seems like it would fit better with montipora (which encrusts and branches with star/flower shaped polyps) than anything. But the polyps are much larger than montipora.
I like the idea of calling it "MPS", but I doubt that will catch on.
Does anyone have Charlie Veron's phone number? :bigsmile:
What we know:
- It doesn't fit perfectly in either of the hobbysist defined categories.
- it is classified in the Faviidae family (brain coral)
- There are at least two variations of growth to confuse things
We need to look at how Faviidae is described to understand why it is classified there: "Roundish, hemispherical, brain like" Faviidae I don't think an encrusting/branching coral fits here.
It seems like it would fit better with montipora (which encrusts and branches with star/flower shaped polyps) than anything. But the polyps are much larger than montipora.
I like the idea of calling it "MPS", but I doubt that will catch on.
Does anyone have Charlie Veron's phone number? :bigsmile:
DLuce510
A.D.I.D.A.A.
Maybe we as a hobby should move away from classifications of hard line categories and encourage a move back to proper scientific names. Just sayin.
I personally love cyphastrea. Encrusted over everything, easy to frag and relatively hardy IME. kinda doesn't get too much love and there's some great pieces other than meteor shower. Where's the cyphastrea lover thread, huh!?!?
I personally love cyphastrea. Encrusted over everything, easy to frag and relatively hardy IME. kinda doesn't get too much love and there's some great pieces other than meteor shower. Where's the cyphastrea lover thread, huh!?!?
DLuce510
A.D.I.D.A.A.
I hope so! I've seen one page of a few shots, little love..I think there is one
