You think that's ok?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You think that's ok?
But what are the other sides? I can't think of one besides "I want this fish because it looks pretty."
This doesn't look like it's even pointing to fish as a global warming/killing the reefs thing, but rather that the hobby as it is now just picks fish out of the ocean to kill them with no real purpose. We're trying to say we keep them fat and happy in our homes for a long time, but there's a reason that people on here who have had their fish the 15-20 years they're capable of living are celebrities on this forum.
This is spot on. We are visual creatures. Nobody cares about things they don't see. You can read all the articles you want about any subject but you will not be really impacted if you can't connect visually.How about advancements in understanding coral propagation, fish breeding, etc? The majority of damage to reefs have nothing to do with our hobby, yet our hobby(and the money behind it) is why we have made massive strides in propagation and breeding. So we are not behind the majority of the destruction, but we (a collective "we" referring to the industry) are a large part of the reason that reef restoration projects are becoming increasingly common... and increasingly successful.
I am not saying we should not minimize our impact, but I am certainly saying there are two sides to this story.
Speech police are not helpful to conversations. Be offended if u want but keep it private....You think that's ok?
Using certain words on public forums isn't helpful to conversations either, it's hurtful. You don't refer to people as retards when you try cases in the Supreme Court do you? If you want to say it out in the middle of nowhere next to your sooty woodstove, go ahead, just keep it private.Speech police are not helpful to conversations. Be offended if u want but keep it private....
I have recently come to discover that the youth see your rough language as a clear sign that you are an "oppressor" because you use hard words. They have learned to ignore everything else you say after you speak roughly, ("Mr. Oppressor" ) and they cancel out your opinion because you are not "woke" like they are.Speech police are not helpful to conversations. Be offended if u want but keep it private....


I am not "woke"??!! dang it! Lolyou are not "woke" like they are.
I didnt say anything but the reading posts from thin egg shell crowd telling people on a forum that they are offended is not why i come on this forum.Using words like "retarded" on public forums isn't helpful to conversations either, it's hurtful. You don't refer to people as retards when you try cases in the Supreme Court do you? If you want to say it out in the middle of nowhere next to your sooty woodstove, go ahead, just keep it private.
Stupidity as well (interpret that as you wish).Infuriating ! This country is LONG overdue for a purge, but we the people aren't well enough equipped nor predisposed to take action in enough majority to carry it out.Delete this comment if you like as it may not be appropriate, but corruption and tyranny are becoming more and more rampant and need to be stamped out.
The entire reason anthropogenic global warming theory was imagined was to promote, and guilt, people into a collectivist society where the few rule the many.Marxism doesn’t apply
You’re replying to the wrong guy. Your fear mongering is noted. Comments like this are a dime a dozen. What a sad state humanity has reached.The entire reason anthropogenic global warming theory was imagined was to promote, and guilt, people into a collectivist society where the few rule the many.
If autocrats drunk on power and control can justify regulating what we exhale and the by product of energy itself, i.e., CO2, there is no limit to what government can regulate and control.
The type of junk science, utterly unrelated to scientific method, used to push this means (anthropogetic global warming theory and guilt) to an end (collectivism, i.e., marxism, power by the few over the many which is an old as human history) is exactly the same kind of junk science used to justify hawaii's ban.
It the near future, this type of junk science is going to be the basis for animals and trees to sue humans for "abuse"--such as kidnapping them and/or locking them in glass cages.
Anyone who doubts what am i saying cant see the forest through the trees...
Reefers unite against such junk science and dogma or lose your hobby...
Yeah..............can't wait to see that "science free" reef tank.The entire reason anthropogenic global warming theory was imagined was to promote, and guilt, people into a collectivist society where the few rule the many.
If autocrats drunk on power and control can justify regulating what we exhale and the by product of energy itself, i.e., CO2, there is no limit to what government can regulate and control.
The type of junk science, utterly unrelated to scientific method, used to push this means (anthropogetic global warming theory and guilt) to an end (collectivism, i.e., marxism, power by the few over the many which is an old as human history) is exactly the same kind of junk science used to justify hawaii's ban.
It the near future, this type of junk science is going to be the basis for animals and trees to sue humans for "abuse"--such as kidnapping them and/or locking them in glass cages.
Anyone who doubts what am i saying cant see the forest through the trees...
Reefers unite against such junk science and dogma or lose your hobby...

