Darth Maul Pics and Question

akabryanhall

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
2,925
Reaction score
185
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been working on my photography skills, let me know what you think.
Actinic only
ActinicDarth.jpg

Daylight
DarthDay.jpg


Question for chalice experts, this chalice is a good 2" across, I need to frag it into 4 pieces but it only has 2 eyes, is this possible?
 
Seems blurry..The last pic hurts my eyes a lil...

Things can only get better good luck!!
 
Yeah but that is not really the darth maul. The darth maul chalice originated from Matt at reefready.com. My friend (tuberider) actually found the colony. If that came from wwc that isn't the real darth maul chalice.
 
Ahh it did come from wwc, the gy that sold it to me wasnt sure if it was darth maul or what they called the volcano chalice, it does have black streaks..
Its blurry cause I dont have a macro lens and cropped it out to blow it up, unfortunately it highlights my imperfect photo taking skills.
It sounds lame but I think my glasses are preventing me getting a good pic have a hard time putting my eye up to the view window and seeing if I am as in focus as I want to be.
 
Can I frag it if it only has two eyes into more than 2 pieces?
 
I really like the growth pattern on it though, reminds me of a thumb print
 
I dont see anything special about the real or fake darth maul. I think that it gets some publicity because the one wwc has is not the one someone else has or named but if not for that bit of controversy its just a red chalice with some black in it. I see nothing special about it. Just my opinion not trying to start anything.
 
I dont see anything special about the real or fake darth maul. I think that it gets some publicity because the one wwc has is not the one someone else has or named but if not for that bit of controversy its just a red chalice with some black in it. I see nothing special about it. Just my opinion not trying to start anything.
I pretty much agree. I think what attracts people to the original, at least from a collector's standpoint, is that it was one of the OG chalices before chalices were even considered "cool". On top of that, the "real" darth maul has a pretty tight lineage, from what I understand not too many people have it as it was only distributed to a few. I could be wrong, though.
 
No, your right on. It is a tight lineaged piece and not many people do have it. The original owner gave a few frags out and its definately not all the people who think they have it, but for me to like a piece enough to actually want it I still have to think its nice or above average of a piece. This one just doesn't live up to the hype in my opinion.
 
Back to the question at hand, anyone?


I am pretty sure that is not possible...I believe you need eyes for the coral to eat from, otherwise it will not be able to get the nutrients needed for growth and it will just die.

If I am wrong someone will correct me, but thought I would try and help from the limited knowledge I have-haha
 
You will be just fine i have test cut 5 or so of my chalice with out any eye's and it just took longer to grow a new eye
 
You will be just fine i have test cut 5 or so of my chalice with out any eye's and it just took longer to grow a new eye


So you can just frag it anywhere and let it grow out? It may just take longer?
 
So you can just frag it anywhere and let it grow out? It may just take longer?

I have done this before and it will end up growing an eye. I have a piece of the High Octane from WWC and it does not even have an eye yet.
 
Thanks for the info and feedback guys!
In summary, don't quit my job to become a photographer, and frag the *** chalice already lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have fragged a chalice that didnt have an eye, and the piece grew a bunch of eyes ( about 5 or 6) grouped close together quickly, I guess to protect its self from dieing.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top