the variability day to day will be less than 10%. There seems to be some lot-to lot issues with Red Sea reagent that is making us look into other sources for tetraphenylborate for the test.
Not in the same way as the PO4 checkers we've used. It measures PO4 a different way, so you'll need your own calibration curve....
| Method | adaptation of the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edition, Amino Acid method |
It uses the amino acid method instead of the ascorbic acid method that the other PO4 checkers do, so you can't expect the absorbance scale of that high range checker to be similar to the other PO4 checkers.
(I think the following is correct) ammonium will bind in place of K to the TPB and precipitate, so 1 mole of ammonium will get counted like 1 mole of K, so 1-4ppm of ammonium will get counted as ~ 2.2x that much K in ppm.
I have no reason to think that lack of NaCl will change the way the precipitation seems to work. I haven't run the test on K in a freshwater sample.
Due to the Red Sea issues I mentioned, (weird lot-to lot performance and squirrelly answers about future availability) We're currently looking at the
exaqua reagent (5-10% TPB) because it's intended to be used the way we want to use it (turbidity) and it's cheap.
Hach sells pure Na-TPB and it's more than you'll ever need, but expensive.
https://www.hach.com/p-potassium-3-reagent-powder-pillows-pk100/1432399