Diatoms

Belgian Anthias

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 31, 2017
Messages
1,487
Reaction score
681
Location
Aarschot Belgium
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Diatoms, +- 40% of phytoplankton, are the most important food source for zoo-plankton, molluscs, invertebrates, directly or indirectly important for all living creatures, the food chain in the aquarium.
They need silicon to build up there cells. When the water is saturated of silicon dying diatoms will start to form a layer of diatom mud, if the water is unsaturated the skeletons will dissolve in the water.
What is the saturation level of silicon in seawater of 25°C?

Starting up a new aquarium system one may consider to add cultures of pelagic living diatoms and consumers.
To build up a population able to feed the heterotrops enough silicon is needed.
Once a certain population is installed (diatoms and consumers) the water should stay unsaturated of silicon preventing diatom bloom. Dead diatoms and organic waste from consumers containing silicate should provide the silicon needed to maintain a certain diatom population and prevent bentic diatom growth.
The question is, how much silicon?

If a balance can be found between diatom (phytoplankton)growth and consumers it would be possible to control the food chain by manipulating the silicon level and by providing the other building materials to sustain the growth potential of all consumers.
 
I do not know the exact solubility of silica from dead diatoms, but even from quartz it is quite high. The issue in a reef tank is more of a kinetic one than an equilibrium solubility one, I think.

Feature Article: Silica In Reef Aquariums ? Advanced Aquarist | Aquarist Magazine and Blog
https://www.advancedaquarist.com/2003/1/aafeature1

The Dissolution of Quartz Sand
One of the issues that has been floating around the reef keeping hobby for a long time is the issue of whether “silica” sand actually releases soluble silica or not. It is remarkable that so many people have strong opinions on this issue, and yet so few people have ever bothered to do the easy experiment of measuring it. Many even fall for the trap of concluding that since their glass aquarium is not dissolving, then silica sand must not be either. All of the arguments against soluble silica being released from “silica” sand can be easily refuted, and I have done so in the past, but that is not the point of this article. Still, some background is worthwhile before getting to experimental results.

Silica sand is largely composed of quartz. Quartz has a maximum solubility in pure freshwater of about 180 uM (11 ppm as SiO2)36, and is somewhat higher in seawater.37 That value is substantially in excess of the dissolved silica concentrations in any normal part of the ocean (excluding plumes from vents from hot springs and such). So why doesn’t quartz beach sand dissolve? It does, but it does so very slowly. The rate of dissolution of quartz has been studied, and it is very slow. 38 It is the slow dissolution of quartz, not the solubility itself, which allows it to remain on many ocean beaches.

A final comment on quartz sand is that it is known that organic acids can increase the rate of dissolution of quartz by at least a factor of ten.39 This may be especially applicable in reef tanks, where organic materials may be in abundance, particularly when organisms are living directly on the sand, potentially releasing such acids directly onto the sand surface.

The problem with extrapolating from the known very slow rate of dissolution of quartz to “silica sand” is that it simply is not pure quartz. The dissolution of soluble silica from “quartz sand” (98.5% SiO2) has long been known to exceed the solubility of quartz itself.40 Take a close look at some commercial “silica” sand. It isn’t even close to being white, which an absolutely pure quartz sand will be. There are all sorts of different colored particulates in it (some are even magnetic and can be picked out with a magnet). Without going into detail on mineralogy, suffice to say that there are many minerals that readily dissolve to release silicate into the water. Such dissolution is why freshwater rivers contain so much silica (typically 150 mM (9 ppm SiO2)).4 Your sand claims to be 98% quartz? What about that other 2%? Two percent of a 50-pound bag of sand is a pound of “other stuff”.

If you start with true beach sand, and don’t fracture it much, then it is very likely that you will detect little dissolution of silica from it in a few days (although I’ve not tried it), because most of the readily dissolved minerals would have disappeared long ago (or are trapped inside). But commercial play sands are not typically from beaches, and are not collected with any kind of gentleness. They are often mined from sand pits, crushed, screened, and generally treated rather roughly. This serves to break many of the grains, exposing new mineral inclusions that are then primed to dissolve. This source is, in my opinion, where most of the soluble silica comes from in “silica” sand.

So, on to some experiments. I bought some Quickcrete Play Sand from Home Depot and ran a number of tests on it. In all of the cases shown below the silica concentration was determined with a Hach low range silica kit after filtration through a 0.2 mm syringe filter. In cases where the concentration is above 1 ppm, the sample was diluted with RO/DI water prior to analysis. All experiments were carried out in the dark to reduce any effect due to diatom growth.

In the first experiment I took 3 cups of sand, and suspended it in 3 gallons of freshly made Instant Ocean salt mix that initially contained less than 0.8 mM of silica (0.05 ppm SiO2). After 48 hours of gentle stirring with a powerhead (the water was stirring, but not the sand), the silica concentration had risen to 17 mM (1.0 ppm SiO2).

I then rinsed the same sand 5 times with 1 gallon RO/DI water (1 minute each time), discarded the contents, and then ran the same stirring experiment with 2 new gallons of Instant Ocean salt mix. In 48 hours the silica concentration had again risen, this time to 15 mM (0.92 ppm SiO2). Then I let it sit unstirred for another 96 hours, and the concentration had risen more, to 23 mM (1.4 ppm SiO2).

In a different experiment, I took about 45 pounds of sand, and added 2 gallons of Instant Ocean salt mix. I let this mixture sit for 7 days, with once a day mixing with my hands for about 30 seconds. At then end of this test, the concentration was 90 mM (5.4 ppm SiO2).

It has been suggested that the amount of silica coming from calcerous sand might actually be as high or higher than that from silica sand. To test this hypothesis, I repeated the small-scale experiments above on a calcium carbonate sand from Home Depot (Southdown). In this case, there was some soluble silica released after the first 48 h, but only 1.6 mM (0.1 ppm SiO2), or about a factor of 10 lower than the silica sand. In a long-term test, the concentration had only risen to 5 mM (0.3 ppm SiO2) in 14 days with once a day stirring.

From these experiments, I conclude that:

  1. The “silica” play sand that I purchased from Home Depot can substantially raise the dissolved silica concentration in seawater.
  2. The dissolvable portion of the silica sand cannot be completely removed by several rinses with either fresh or salt water, although it may be decreased somewhat by that process.
  3. Southdown calcium carbonate sand (likely aragonite) can release soluble silica, but about ten fold less than the “silica” sand.
Is it OK to use silica sand? Probably. Many people do so. I also believe that not all “silica “ sands will be the same for the reasons described above relating to processing of the sand and the nature of the mineral inclusions present. So the fact that many people successfully use some (or many) types of silica sand does not necessarily imply that all people can use any type of “silica” sand without a problem.

In subsequent sections of this article I describe dosing recommendations for adding soluble silica. Is silica sand a good way to go from that perspective? I cannot really answer that. It probably provides some silica to reef tanks, but the amount is completely out of the control of the aquarist. For that reason alone, I believe that it would be a poor choice as the sole source of soluble silica for a reef tank. In a tank without any silica dosing, silica sand may, in fact, be more beneficial to the overall tank, at least from a silica delivery standpoint, than calcium carbonate sand. There are, of course, many other differences that might be the deciding factor on sand choice (color, texture, dissolution, particle size distribution, nutrient and metal binding properties of sands, etc). Many of these factors are more aesthetic than technical, and the technical ones are beyond the scope of this article.
 
We use silica sand in two corals tank, not as substrate but in small sand pressure filters. We've found out that as long as the sand in the filter is in water with normal pH and O2, it doesn't release more than is consumed (our Si value is stable or sinking).
But those times the filter has been stopped for a while, Si has increased.
Maybe like this? Water+bacteria+detritus -> depletes oxygen-> pH goes down -> Si is released

It was a while since we replaced the sand in the filters, that was before we started measuring with ICP, so I don't know if new sand releases more Si.

We also seen the same thing with Siporax. Tried to do a reverse "DSB" with Siporax and feed with ethanol, but when pH/O2 dropped in the bed the Si in the whole system increased.
So maybe it would be possible to run a Silica-reactor controlled by pH/CO2, like a calcium reactor? Just guessing now, maybe @Randy Holmes-Farley could give his professional opinion here :)

Anyway, that was some observations from our tanks :)

/ David
 
We use silica sand in two corals tank, not as substrate but in small sand pressure filters. We've found out that as long as the sand in the filter is in water with normal pH and O2, it doesn't release more than is consumed (our Si value is stable or sinking).
But those times the filter has been stopped for a while, Si has increased.
Maybe like this? Water+bacteria+detritus -> depletes oxygen-> pH goes down -> Si is released

The dissolution may also just be slow.

In general, the solubility of silica rises as pH rises, and perhaps not as it falls:

https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/pdf/IGAstandard/SGW/2014/Utami.pdf
 
According to the amount of diatomic earth one may assume that ocean water was mostly saturated with silicon. To be able to have control, as a guide a measurable amount of silicon dioxide must be present and included in the food supply of the phytoplankton to maintain a minimal level.
One may not take conclusions on the fact of brownish coloured growth on the windows or bottom. Chrysophyta ( golden brown algae) posses also only chlorophyll a and c and several caratenoids which gives them the same brownish colour as diatoms for the same reason. A lot are also unicellular, as diatoms are, and the difference is not easily determined. Chrysophyta do not form a silica cell wall.
Will it be possible to produce enough phytoplankton and algae to support and supply enough food to full fill the demand? if this is possible, no organic food has to be added to the system!? (After introduction of the primary consumers)
Diatoms, as photoautotrophs, have two very special and unique futures, the need for silicon to form the cell walls and the presence of an urea cycle to use nitrogen. How these special futures can be used to control there growth?
 
Last edited:
How these special futures can be used to control there growth?

I could turn diatom growth on and off at will by silicate dosing. When I dosed a burst of silicate, the green growth on the glass turned golden brown for a few days, then back to green until I dosed again.
 
If confirmed the green colour of algae growth changes to brownish due to diatom growth one may also conclude that diatoms will outperform other photo-autothrops if not silicon limited. As they have to battle for the same nutrients and building materials they must have other advantages to make it possible to develop the explosive growth and burst pattern, typical for diatoms.
 
If confirmed the green colour of algae growth changes to brownish due to diatom growth one may also conclude that diatoms will outperform other photo-autothrops if not silicon limited. As they have to battle for the same nutrients and building materials they must have other advantages to make it possible to develop the explosive growth and burst pattern, typical for diatoms.

In my tank, at least, that was certainly the case.

https://www.advancedaquarist.com/2003/1/aafeature1

Figure 3. A view of the inside of the front glass of my reef tank 5 days after scraping the glass.
image_preview


Figure 6. A view of the inside of the front glass of my reef tank 5 days after scraping the glass and adding the silica supplement.

image_preview
 
If the second special future used by diatoms, the ornithine-urea cycle, is responsible for out-competing already installed micro-algae, probably there was a limited availability of nitrogen in the tank wile dosing silica?
To avoid explosive diatom growth wile silica dosing one may assume there must be enough nitrate available to make phosphate the limiting factor for growth? Otherwise they will out compete all other algae due to there ability to fix inorganic carbon with nitrogen compounds a lot faster.
 
If the second special future used by diatoms, the ornithine-urea cycle, is responsible for out-competing already installed micro-algae, probably there was a limited availability of nitrogen in the tank wile dosing silica?
To avoid explosive diatom growth wile silica dosing one may assume there must be enough nitrate available to make phosphate the limiting factor for growth? Otherwise they will out compete all other algae due to there ability to fix inorganic carbon with nitrogen compounds a lot faster.

My tank was not typically a low nutrient tank, and I'm not sure what aspect of their biology allowed diatoms to out-compete green algae in my experiment. It could have been many different things, some of which are chemical competition (uptake of limiting nutrients or trace elements) and some of which are different issues, such as simply growing faster when there is plenty of everything, maybe allelopathy, maybe faster settling on the clean glass, etc.
 
My tank was not typically a low nutrient tank, and I'm not sure what aspect of their biology allowed diatoms to out-compete green algae in my experiment. It could have been many different things, some of which are chemical competition (uptake of limiting nutrients or trace elements) and some of which are different issues, such as simply growing faster when there is plenty of everything, maybe allelopathy, maybe faster settling on the clean glass, etc.

If there is plenty of everything they do not grow faster! They divide faster but each division they become smaller till they are to small to divide, then they form a sort of cist and follows a lag phase to grow to the initial volume. The lag phase period depends of the availability off all building materials after which the log phase is restarted. Only in a nitrogen limited environment they grow a lot faster as the competitors and will be able to take over. On a window they are not surrounded by water and nitrogen may become limited available on the surface. I do not know(yet) if bentic diatoms have an adapted or specialised live cycle.
 
For dosing silica and controlling diatom growth one should have an idea of the saturation level, otherwise we can not know how much silica is needed because most of the silica may be not in solution and the silicon cycle is not completed.
Probably the natural level is equal to the saturation level as there is a lot of diatomic mud available in the sea ?
 
Last edited:
My tank was not typically a low nutrient tank, and I'm not sure what aspect of their biology allowed diatoms to out-compete green algae in my experiment. .

If nitrate is not detectable one may assume there is a lot of competition for nitrogen. Research about the urea cycle showed that only in nitrogen limited conditions diatoms grow a lot faster as the competitors. ( if not silicon limited)
 
If nitrate is not detectable one may assume there is a lot of competition for nitrogen. Research about the urea cycle showed that only in nitrogen limited conditions diatoms grow a lot faster as the competitors. ( if not silicon limited)

My tank never had undetectable nitrate.
 
For dosing silica and controlling diatom growth one should have an idea of the saturation level, otherwise we can not know how much silica is needed because most of the silica may be not in solution and the silicon cycle is not completed.
Probably the natural level is equal to the saturation level as there is a lot of diatomic mud available in the sea ?

No, diatoms are consuming it rapidly. Silicate is very low in surface water and much higher in deep water for this reason. It is different in different deep oceans, and it is not assumed to be saturated at those levels.
 
If there is plenty of everything they do not grow faster! They divide faster but each division they become smaller till they are to small to divide, then they form a sort of cist and follows a lag phase to grow to the initial volume. The lag phase period depends of the availability off all building materials after which the log phase is restarted. Only in a nitrogen limited environment they grow a lot faster as the competitors and will be able to take over. On a window they are not surrounded by water and nitrogen may become limited available on the surface. I do not know(yet) if bentic diatoms have an adapted or specialised live cycle.

I don't know about what specific situation you are referring to, but diatoms grow exponentially when they have plenty of nutrients and space:

https://www.researchgate.net/public...sira_pseudonana_and_Phaeodactylum_tricornutum

"Two marine diatoms were studied singly and in mixed culture. Thalassiosira pseudonana (Hust.) Hade & Heimdal was capable of a higher growth rate (μmax) than Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin. In two-species batch cultures P. tricornutum took over in the latter portion of the exponential phase, possibly due to allelopathy. "
 
I don't know about what specific situation you are referring to, but diatoms grow exponentially when they have plenty of nutrients and space:

https://www.researchgate.net/public...sira_pseudonana_and_Phaeodactylum_tricornutum

"Two marine diatoms were studied singly and in mixed culture. Thalassiosira pseudonana (Hust.) Hade & Heimdal was capable of a higher growth rate (μmax) than Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin. In two-species batch cultures P. tricornutum took over in the latter portion of the exponential phase, possibly due to allelopathy. "

The log phase ! After the logarithmic phase they need a lag phase to grow to there initial volume, after which they restart the log phase. The typical for diatoms growth and burst rate.

Of coarse every specimen has its own growth rate as they have different volumes and shapes . But only in nitrogen limited conditions they are able to out compete the competitors for the available nutrients.
Due to there explosive growth and burst live style they must be able to create the nitrogen limited environment favourable for them.
 
Last edited:
If the water is saturated the dying not consumed diatom skeletons will accumulate. These skeletons will dissolve when the water becomes unsaturated. What happens with the excreted silica not used by the Diatom and Radiola consumers?
To be able to enter a correct dose of silicon into the food chain the saturation level may not be reached to be able to measure the daily consumption. So, any level is acceptable as long the water does not become saturated and the level is detectable, measurable?
Maintaining the level between 1 ppm SiO2 and 2 ppm SiO2 seems to be a safe range?
 
If the water is saturated the dying not consumed diatom skeletons will accumulate. These skeletons will dissolve when the water becomes unsaturated. What happens with the excreted silica not used by the Diatom and Radiola consumers?
To be able to enter a correct dose of silicon into the food chain the saturation level may not be reached to be able to measure the daily consumption. So, any level is acceptable as long the water does not become saturated and the level is detectable, measurable?
Maintaining the level between 1 ppm SiO2 and 2 ppm SiO2 seems to be a safe range?

I dosed about 200 ug Si/L once a week (= 0.43 ppm SiO2). It depleted substantially within a few days. :)
 
FWIW, skimmers are a big export of silica, presumably as diatoms:

https://www.advancedaquarist.com/2010/2/aafeature

"In summary, the skimmer is pulling out a solid mixture of compounds that consist by weight of (approximately):

  • 8% inorganic ions
  • 26 % of CaCO3
  • 7% of MgCO3
  • 21% of biogenic opal (SiO2)
  • 38% of organic material
  • 1.5% of phosphate
  • 1.3 % of ferric oxide"
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top