my bumpquestion above is actually to dig into a theory I have that specifically
nano reef tank invasions are 100% psychological and not biological issues
sounds crazy I know
but, consider this: what else is it when a system that returns any nano to pristine view in 2 hours is not opted for, and instead what's opted for is to leave the invasion in place, wrecking the tank, as further considerations are made
that's a choice event
if fixing nano reef invasions was a matter of chemistry, I'd have eighty pages of chemistry + fixed reefs on file
if fixing nano reef invasions was a matter of species ID, knowing what the invader is, I'd have eighty pages linked of the finest species ID known to reefing
but none of that is what we used to fix eighty pages of wrecked tanks, action did that. what I was hoping for was the .004% occurrence where when status is inquired, someone posts a picture set that looked like this meaning they
went to town on that invasion:
shadow_k really did such a reply shock to me with those two pics lol, that's why I put his work on page one of the rip clean threads.
all we needed to fix the op's tank was for the links posted to be applied, then in two hours the op's tank will look like this same succession.
you'd then lower the light power as discussed, and prepare for another rip clean later on due to the delay, we might even need to remove sand, beat dinos in a bare bottom tank, then put back sand.
we judge that from the growback if any after the first rip clean.