It was more the density & even full screen coverage of what appears to be Ulva in that time period that surprises me.
I don’t believe variation in spectrum has anything much to do with the fast establishment of Ulva algae (especially in Chris' case), but rather intensity of light, & probably other factors unrelated to light.
The ideal intensity of light for a mature scrubber screen will cause photo-inhibition on a new screen. As long as there is 660nm red light algae will grow. Blue isn’t necessary, especially when Ulva has developed/mature screen.
Chris’ ‘new’ lights consist of 8 Red 660nm (the A band & most important for photosynthesis) & 1 Blue 460nm. Probably the exact same, or at least similar as his previous light (but possible quite different in regards to intensity), & his previous LED light didn’t give growth anything comparable to his present screen.
I found the difference between using red/blue light as opposed to just red 660, was, just red produces only, or predominently ulva growth, while mostly, or totally bypassing all the other mucky unwanted algae/diatom growth.
These photos show the progression of ulva growth using just red 660nm LEDs. The bare section in the middle is due to ‘new screen photo-inhibition’ (too intensive light for start up).