Thank You Randy.
Has anyone calculated the ratio for citric acid? A few weeks ago I bought some gravity feed bags and I just received this 5lb bag from
amazon and was experimenting last night.
Kangaroo 1000mL Enteral Feeding Gravity Bag Set from HealthyKin.com is used when a patient has adequate gastric motility to tolerate a bolus feed.
www.healthykin.com
I didn't calculate anything, I decided to take a reverse engineering approach. I simply grabbed my kitchen scale and measured out distilled water and the powder from the citric acid.
These gravity bags are only 1000ml, which was my starting point. I weighed 1000g of distilled water (grocery store) and added an extra 5g of citric acid. Why 5 grams? No real reason, just figured it was a good starting point. I mixed the solution until it was completely dissolved.
I removed the old reagent from pump C and the line by using the priming option on the app. Then added the citric acid mixture to the alkatronic. Again, I primed pump C and let it flush out 20ml.
Ran a test and quickly realized that 5g of acid was too much, the results of the test displayed "4.54 4.170". What does those numbers mean to me??? I'm just guessing but 4.54 is the limited range that the alkatronic could read, so it was off the charts. and the 4.170 is the pH probe reading. Again I can be completely wrong, I was just using logic and guessing.
I took the remaining reagent and poured it back into a container to measure it, I don't remember what it was, roughly 970g. What ever the number was, I doubled it with more distilled water, essentially bringing the mixture to roughly 2.5g to 1000g.
Flushed out the alkatronic again the same way and ran the test. This time it made it through the entire test and the pH probe hit it's target measurement of 4.230 to render a result.
Before I tell you what the result was, I grabbed my hanna tester and measured the DKH. 3 tests and the results were the same 7.8.
The results of the citric acid solution: the measurement was 7.45. I ran the alkatronic test 4 more times:
7.36 4.230,
7.45 4.230,
7.38 4.230,
7.45 4.230.
this was close enough to correct through the "baseline calibration" on the app.
I know this wasn't a scientific approach but it should give those that are more qualified a good starting point, and in hopes to keep this thread from going no where, I'm trying to breathe new hope to it.