- Joined
- Oct 18, 2020
- Messages
- 66
- Reaction score
- 56
- Location
- Olympia
- What state or country do you live in
- Washington
Hello,
I am planning out my first salt water tank. I would love to get some sort of automatic water change system. It seems like the most common setup is two paristolic pumps. But I have seen folks talking about using an overflow in the sump and adding fresh saltwater to the system, using a timer and pump, so that the excess just goes out the overflow. If you make the height of the overflow the same as the ATO level, it seems like the second system has less points of failure and accomplishes the same thing. Also if there is a failure it seems to always fail in a more favorable condition (or at least the same condition) . I guess my question is why isn't this setup more common? Is there some error in my thinking? Is this not practical for most people? Would I run into any problems if I did it this way? Or would it be better to get paristolic pumps?
I am planning out my first salt water tank. I would love to get some sort of automatic water change system. It seems like the most common setup is two paristolic pumps. But I have seen folks talking about using an overflow in the sump and adding fresh saltwater to the system, using a timer and pump, so that the excess just goes out the overflow. If you make the height of the overflow the same as the ATO level, it seems like the second system has less points of failure and accomplishes the same thing. Also if there is a failure it seems to always fail in a more favorable condition (or at least the same condition) . I guess my question is why isn't this setup more common? Is there some error in my thinking? Is this not practical for most people? Would I run into any problems if I did it this way? Or would it be better to get paristolic pumps?

