Do I have too much biological filtration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alazo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None

Alazo1

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
126
Reaction score
43
What state or country do you live in
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It is a 120g. standard.
In the display there is 40lbs of Live Rock for KP Aquatics
In the sump there is 2 gallons of Matrix and 10 liters of Spiorax
With the matrix, I added a bottle of Dr Tims one and only.

The tank is only a few months old. (Restart , all acros died about 3 months ago).
The corals that I brought over (that survived the crash) are doing good except the Torch and a frag of Duncan that I bought during transition. The water is probably just too clean right now. I may have to hand feed them.

The question is if you think I have too much biological filtration. The common thing I read is that you could never have too much biological filtration because your system will not have more bacteria that is need. However, I thought I saw a thread that said that the person had to remove some of the filtration, I think it was Siporax.

thanks,
Albert
 
U can not over filter a fish tank.
Ppl will say they bottom out nitraites and phosphates but it's likely undetectable and used as needed rather than being 0...
D
 
IMO there is no such thing as too much biological filtration. If the biological filtration keeps your nutrient levels too low then just use that as a reason the feed more. Feeding more will keep your fish happy and it’ll raise nutrients which will help with corals.
 
Good points, thanks.

I'll up the feeding a bit and watch. The ugly phase came in for about 2 weeks and is subsiding. Some of the coralline is starting to grow back on the live rock.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top