That's what I've read as the universal response across forums and videos. This is my take on bulk thread post anecdote validity:
how many people online support use of the eco aqualyzer today for reef tanks I know you remember that 2002 gem Randy

it had been ran through the exact same gamut as refugia, ats by santa monica, carbon boosting, all our trends. battling over two primary molecules, nitrate and phosphate, gave us the ability to critique by testing after the setup ourselves.
aqualyzer was ran through the collective rc poster world of critics and found not working anecdotally, meaning a hundred regular joes posted nitrate readings unaffected and the notion of using magnets for denitrification was abandoned. its thriving in the hot tub market amazingly however
then I contrast that to German reefkeepers who write in their online threads of the difference it made in sensitive bee tanks, in hoards of positive reviews, I just put in YouTube german bee tank oxydator and hit up some of the comments for patterns.
What eludes us and keeps the oxydator and any other peroxide use in perma anecdote is nobody claims it cleaves a nitrate molecule. .. no test params to dissect. They just keep posting algae cure pics en masse and have no data to show how it is attained. The best formal review of reef tank oxidizer use will hopefully illuminate that gap of understanding. We have always been aware peroxide is a chemically bad thing to put in a tank, but people's after pics and no loss testimonies are numbering in the multi thousands now, anecdote is creeping up to legitimacy here we need to know why. The after pic page 2 x10,000 is driving the anecdote. That and a few diligent carnival barkers