Just did my first maintenance on my Vertex RX-C 6D Calcium Reactor. The media chamber was only about half empty but my Kameor Peristaltic Dosing pump was having difficulty pulling water through the reactor for some reason (and the pump is brand new as I just got a replacement after the screen on my first one went dead after about 2 months), so I opted to tear it down and clean it out and refill the media.
I guess you could chalk this up to, “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” but while doing the maintenance which included calibrating the pH probe, I decided to calibrate the pH probe of my Pinpoint monitor that I use for the tank. To my surprise the probe in the reactor was still perfectly calibrated but the one for my system was WAY off. I had been under the impression my tank was running between 8.1 and 7.85 for months, but after the calibration the reality hit and my tank is running at 7.75-7.55?!? But if everything looks healthy and is growing well and it’s been like this presumably for months, do I change anything at all?
Everything has been doing great and the only thing I’ve noticed different is the slowing of my chaeto growth in my fuge.
I’m gonna play around with the pH within the reactor and the flow rate to hopefully reduce the impact on my pH but a thought came to mind. And please forgive me as I’m sure this is WAY oversimplified.
If the pH is being driven down by the amount of CO2 being introduced to the system could you counteract this effect by dosing Oxygen, say as a supplement to the air normally drawn into your Skimmer or even just through a bubble wand or wooden air stone in your sump to increase absorption?
Would dosing straight O2 or even oxygen enriched air cause any issues in nit thinking of? And as long as we are talking about Oxygen, what about using Ozone? (My least favorite option)
Any and all input is greatly appreaciated!
PS I’m considering approaching it the traditional way with Kalwasser in my ATO but for some reason that just seems like such an anomalous thing to me. How can you know exactly what concentration you are adding as the ATO reservoir would be constantly changing as water is used and then water is added and kalwasser is depleted and then replenished. And that doesn’t even account for the variations in your evaporation rates that would impact your kalkwasser “dosing”.
Hey Randy, what are your thoughts?
I guess you could chalk this up to, “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” but while doing the maintenance which included calibrating the pH probe, I decided to calibrate the pH probe of my Pinpoint monitor that I use for the tank. To my surprise the probe in the reactor was still perfectly calibrated but the one for my system was WAY off. I had been under the impression my tank was running between 8.1 and 7.85 for months, but after the calibration the reality hit and my tank is running at 7.75-7.55?!? But if everything looks healthy and is growing well and it’s been like this presumably for months, do I change anything at all?
Everything has been doing great and the only thing I’ve noticed different is the slowing of my chaeto growth in my fuge.
I’m gonna play around with the pH within the reactor and the flow rate to hopefully reduce the impact on my pH but a thought came to mind. And please forgive me as I’m sure this is WAY oversimplified.
If the pH is being driven down by the amount of CO2 being introduced to the system could you counteract this effect by dosing Oxygen, say as a supplement to the air normally drawn into your Skimmer or even just through a bubble wand or wooden air stone in your sump to increase absorption?
Would dosing straight O2 or even oxygen enriched air cause any issues in nit thinking of? And as long as we are talking about Oxygen, what about using Ozone? (My least favorite option)
Any and all input is greatly appreaciated!
PS I’m considering approaching it the traditional way with Kalwasser in my ATO but for some reason that just seems like such an anomalous thing to me. How can you know exactly what concentration you are adding as the ATO reservoir would be constantly changing as water is used and then water is added and kalwasser is depleted and then replenished. And that doesn’t even account for the variations in your evaporation rates that would impact your kalkwasser “dosing”.
Hey Randy, what are your thoughts?



