drain and return guidance for 8ft 240 gallon

[Clownfish2]

Soon I will be purchasing an 8ft 240gallon tank. I need to decide some specifics on it such as number of holes in the overflow box, their diameters, and the location of the returns and their diameters. I have used the Herbie system in the past and liked it, but I want to try the Bean Animal 3 drain on this tank with an external overflow box.

1. Planet Aquariums has multiple configurations to choose from in terms of drain location and return location. If using an external overflow box bean animal style, are 3 drains inside the overflow box and 2 returns located on the rear glass of the aquarium in the left side corner and right side corner a good set-up? Planet has one option to put 5 holes total in the overflow box 3 for the drain and 2 return, but I thought this would be less efficient for water skimming and distributing flow throughout the tank surface.

2. what diameter should the drains be?

3. what should the return line diameters be?

Thanks

 

[rwreef]

Following along. I am also going to start a 240g project. My thoughts were external overflow, 2 drains, 1 emergency

 

[Devaji]

I bet if you ask them they should be able to recommend what is "best"

I would think 1" for returns and 1.5" for drains. but curious to see what others say.

 

[Gablami]

I would think 1" for returns and 1.5" for drains. but curious to see what others say.

This is what I have. 1.5” overflows, bean animal external overflow. 1” returns on each side of overflow. You could go larger on returns, but consider that more siphon goes into the sump, even with antisiphon break holes, unless you place check valves.

And one big tip, don’t ask for 1.25” returns because it is IMPOSSIBLE to find the right bulkheads for that. I’ve tried. 1.5” returns is too large for that size tank imo.

 

[Leyth]

This is what I have. 1.5” overflows, bean animal external overflow. 1” returns on each side of overflow. You could go larger on returns, but consider that more siphon goes into the sump, even with antisiphon break holes, unless you place check valves.

And one big tip, don’t ask for 1.25” returns because it is IMPOSSIBLE to find the right bulkheads for that. I’ve tried. 1.5” returns is too large for that size tank imo.

Any downsides to having too large return holes on that sized tank? I would have thought you could get some powerful return pumps and lower your need for powerheads in the display that way.

 

[Gablami]

Any downsides to having too large return holes on that sized tank? I would have thought you could get some powerful return pumps and lower your need for powerheads in the display that way.

I think that at some point you have diminishing returns when oversizing your return plumbing. The plumbing should be proportional to the pump size. For instance, if your vectra m1s outlet bushing is 3/4” and you go up to 2” plumbing, you would be losing flow velocity, even if your total return volume is greater due to reduced head pressure. But I’m certainly no expert on this topic.

To your other point, powerheads in the tank are much more efficient way to provide flow, compared to return flow or “closed loop” systems. But yes, there may be aesthetic concerns with that.

 

[arowana718]

Bulkhead sugguestion

Hello all, i hope i can get some input on this. The input and out will have similar setup. is this okay. Slip Bulkhead + pvc pipe glued + pvc threaded adapter glue + Barb hose adapter i will be attaching vinyl hose to the barb end

www.reef2reef.com

Look at the last post with pics i put up

 

[Leyth]

I think that at some point you have diminishing returns when oversizing your return plumbing. The plumbing should be proportional to the pump size. For instance, if your vectra m1s outlet bushing is 3/4” and you go up to 2” plumbing, you would be losing flow velocity, even if your total return volume is greater due to reduced head pressure. But I’m certainly no expert on this topic.

To your other point, powerheads in the tank are much more efficient way to provide flow, compared to return flow or “closed loop” systems. But yes, there may be aesthetic concerns with that.

Ah that makes sense. Thank you