You mentioned algae strands
by rule of benthic visual cuing that alone confirms your cycle is done given no testing at all. It’s not possible to have rocks underwater long enough to have algae, cyano, diatoms or any other benthic organism and not be completely cycled for ammonia control
why isn’t that rule told to us from a podium at MACNA
because that rule doesn’t sell anything.
what I want from the next MACNA podium speaker on cycling:
-no cycle stalls evidenced by all threads on stalling where any animal in the tank is just fine. A stalled cycle can’t control ammonia and the animals die and we can see them dying without anyone’s test kit for any parameter. Living fish for weeks on end means the opposite of a stuck cycle, it means a working cycle is in place.
-rules on visual cycle verification using benthic cue markers
-statement that fish disease is the sole, #1 and exclusive worry for reefers during a cycle and that no degree of waiting can make up for the need for specific fish disease preps.
-a statement on how the ammonia line on a cycle chart is correct, and a statement analysis on # of posts showing inflated sales of bottle bacteria based on nitrite rules but zero change in the loss rate from fish disease no matter how one cycles, fast or slow. I want the speaker to relate these last ten year’s hobby focus on nitrite control back to the ability or inability to lessen the rates of fish disease within eight months after tank setup.
they should end the paid talk with: a reef tank is NOT safe for fish after you’ve waited long enough for api to show zero on the two core parameters. Your tank is safe for fish once you apply humblefish disease prep protocols, nitrite has no bearing on reef tank cycling and if you consider it during your cycle it will be to the exclusion of all disease preps required.