Raymond it's neat you wrote this:
I think that's really high and is impractical as a real scenario.
I agree so much on that statement, I made a huge thread that generated tons of anger and we almost left the site in a tiff permanently over that notion so easily covered above lol. I just thought you might like to see the 2.0 version of that statement above, being ran through some of the strongest chemistry gatekeepers on the site. final tally: gatekeepers zero, updated cycling science for the win. dosing to 2ppm ammonia simply isn't needed.
We are all 100% familiar with the sales adage that a cycle is only proven when you can move 2ppm ammonia to zero multiple times before a cycle can be deemed reliable 9.9/10 cycling umpires online stand firm with this information in unison to anyone posting doubt about cycle completion, what...
www.reef2reef.com
it's not even needed more than one time. when you dose ammonia and it drops one time, that cycle is locked in, and all the surface area stewing in the water is activated and can't be uncycled off any degree of water changes after that lock in date. a common cycling chart shows the lock in date within ten days for ammonia control, that happens in all cycles, only non digital test kits seem to make things take 30 days or more. digital test kits reveal ammonia control 100% of the time within ten days, any arrangment we want to create with a dry start cycle using the common boosters you've used.