His example of being able to move down large initial doses of ammonia added is the testimony to the power of bottle bac, and its quickness.
we do not need to dose it more than once
the initial drop wasn't a lark we need to re prove.
imagine the light light comparative bioload from two clowns in a starting nano, it can easily move that down instantly too.
this is why 100% of the examples we can search for about fish in cycles only show them working, I cannot find a fail of gray water and all dead fish and bad smell within two days of start. that's a dead cycle tank. Fish-in cycles were never, ever burning fish with ammonia or they wouldnt be feeding and acting normally as 100% of searchable examples show.
every example of a stuck cycle I can find, or a bad fish-in cycle involves merely api or red sea and no TAN conversion per paper instructions on the kit. I have never seen seneye prove a stuck cycle not once, not ever. There are now thousands of seneye reports online now for patterning to verify
The sole risk in cycling in 2021 is fish disease. any arrangement you attempt for ammonia control is going to work, they just are ready on different predetermined dates depending on boosters used. A completely 100% unassisted cycle, dry rocks and water only and time, will be fully self-cycled off natural inputs within 60 days. tested twice already. if anyone else is down for the test lets do more for patterning. That link above shows that even if his ammonia didnt move down quickly initially, it's still cycled after just a few day's wait (after a big water change to export the jolt large initial dose of ammonia)
Sounds crazy aware, but the very first example link among 100 was chosen because we see that action and track a nano reef out to carrying fish and anemone not long after. waiting for the initial wastewater to clear out (on API, its not really taking that long on seneye) is not required in cycling, its directly linked first read.