Four instruments.. four very different salinity readings.

also, a 1.025 standard is cheap and easily available - I'm guess only one of those is right.... smile
 
Aside from the refractometer they are all close enough.

Lots of factors to consider. When were they last properly calibrated? Were all of the samples the same temperature? Was that temperature the same as the fluid used to calibrate the tool? The Hydrometer is probably your best bet provided that it is a seawater Hydrometer and not intended for another use.
 
I agree with @Sean Clark. If you look at them and take the hydrometer as 'right' the Hanna is .002 low and the Milwaukee .002 high. That is an acceptable range. I would double check the calibration of the refractometer.
 
I would test each against RODI which should be 1.000 (or close to..)
Refractomer - 1.030
Hydrometer - 1.025
Hannah Digital - 1.023
Milwaukee Digital - 1.027

This is a bit ridiculous. Which of these do I trust?
Have one or two trusted LFS test salinity for you and compare with each of yours for closest or same. My guess would be Hydrometer and Hanna
 
I'd lean to the Milwaukee over anything else, hydrometer a close second. We all know refractometers have a tendency to be bogus with numbers (aka you stare at them funny and they loose calibration).
 
I calibrated the Hannah with 35ppt. The others with RODI.
Try calibrating all besides the hydrometer with 35ppt. As someone already mentioned, you need to calibrate as close as possible to the salinity you plan on measuring.

What type of hydrometer? The high quality glass hydrometers are supposed to be the gold standard because they don't need to be calibrated.
 
Try calibrating all besides the hydrometer with 35ppt. As someone already mentioned, you need to calibrate as close as possible to the salinity you plan on measuring.

What type of hydrometer? The high quality glass hydrometers are supposed to be the gold standard because they don't need to be calibrated.
A cheapo plastic one I picked up when I first got into the hobby many years ago.
 
this sums of reef testing of all the params, excellent thread to reflect on the decisions we make on guess test kits
 
when cycle trouble shooters but the first stated range without question, that always amazes me. you can literally name any ammonia number in a cycling thread and the umps will believe it and say the bacteria are dead. this kind of thread is handy to know we're all ballparking, guesstimating.
 
I calibrated the Hannah with 35ppt. The others with RODI.

Depending on the refractometer, using ro/di for calibration may be theoretically ok, but it may also be inherently inaccurate and it is worth checking every device in a 35 ppt standard.

Even hydrometers should be checked and must be adjusted for temp issues.

I personally wonder how much of the faith in the accuracy of glass hydrometers is based on the fact that few people test them in 35 ppt standards to actually know.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top