Slight necrothreading here, but I believe the content is useful.
I also asked the same question about FW dip seeming a bit drastic wen we go to so much trouble to acclimatise. The discussion here is clarifying. Thanks.
However, seeing the discussion around FW dip to help (but not solve) potential fluke problems, is it not better just to avoid and go straight to Prazi treament? Given correct aeration set up etc, and the fact Prazi is curative, why even bother with the FW dip stage?
I am asking as BRS seems to push it in their shorter QT protocol.
Thanks - loads to learn here!