Hanna ULR Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter BradB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None

BradB

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
578
Reaction score
338
Location
Hudson
What state or country do you live in
Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've been using the Hanna ULR Phosphate checker for a while now. I had a couple questions:

1) It is almost impossible to get all the dust from a packet into the vial. Does the amount of dust affect the measurement? Or as long as I get enough in, will the reading be the same?

2) It comes with 2 vials. If I mix a packet into 1 vial and fat finger the meter, I fill the 2nd vial and zero the meter as if I were testing it, but then test the first vial, so I don't waste a packet. Any idea how accurate this is?
 
I've been using the Hanna ULR Phosphate checker for a while now. I had a couple questions:

1) It is almost impossible to get all the dust from a packet into the vial. Does the amount of dust affect the measurement? Or as long as I get enough in, will the reading be the same?

2) It comes with 2 vials. If I mix a packet into 1 vial and fat finger the meter, I fill the 2nd vial and zero the meter as if I were testing it, but then test the first vial, so I don't waste a packet. Any idea how accurate this is?
https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/hanna-phosphorus-checker.336206/page-5#post-4224627
Post #93
 
I've been using the Hanna ULR Phosphate checker for a while now. I had a couple questions:

1) It is almost impossible to get all the dust from a packet into the vial. Does the amount of dust affect the measurement? Or as long as I get enough in, will the reading be the same?

2) It comes with 2 vials. If I mix a packet into 1 vial and fat finger the meter, I fill the 2nd vial and zero the meter as if I were testing it, but then test the first vial, so I don't waste a packet. Any idea how accurate this is?
I pour all the powder out of the packet onto a square piece of wax paper (before I begin the test) and only use 1 vial.
 
I have one too and I figure as long as I'm not doing lab grade testing, I'm close enough. The time-out on the meter is a bit of a PIA though. I've wasted more than one test because I didn't get the vial into the checker quick enough. I don't understand why they can't supply liquid tests, but then I'm not chemist. Of course, it does mean they get to sell dolts like me MORE test powder.:rolleyes:
 
I have one too and I figure as long as I'm not doing lab grade testing, I'm close enough. The time-out on the meter is a bit of a PIA though. I've wasted more than one test because I didn't get the vial into the checker quick enough. I don't understand why they can't supply liquid tests, but then I'm not chemist. Of course, it does mean they get to sell dolts like me MORE test powder.:rolleyes:
The time-out on the meter :confused: is why I went with wax paper.

@MrMichael
Passed the wax paper (trick) onto myself and the powder just slides right into the vial :)
 
The time-out on the meter :confused: is why I went with wax paper.

It's not so much getting all the powder into the vial as it is letting the vial sit too long to make sure the microbubbles clear. They WILL alter your test results per the Hanna website. But I'll def try the wax paper trick. Thanx.
 
Since were talking about the ULR checker.
I used to preform the math conversion formula until I found this. The only difference is that the last decimal point has been rounded up.

Screenshot (26).png


Here's the link if anybody wants to bookmark it to their browser.
http://www.pny.se/aquarium/
 
Here is the formula in case you wanted to know.

ppb x 3.066 / 1000 = ppm
Quoted for, WRITE IT DOWN. KEEP IT SECRET. KEEP IT SAFE. 1 internet for the person who knows the movie reference.
 
Last edited:

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top