In another thread where zeolites are being discussed there is mention that zeolites may be efficient at reducing or removing copper, lead, and zinc in seawater.
http://reef2reef.com/threads/do-zeolite-work-in-sea-water.231479
My question is not so much related to zeolites in particular, but heavy metal reduction in general. There are products on the market such as Cuprisorb and PolyFilter. There are probably some other newer products I'm not familiar with as well. We currently do not have an affordable way to measure NSW levels of heavy metals in our tanks (Triton can't test that low), and the occasional use of heavy metal reducing medias may not be a bad idea. I'm just wondering, what do these products remove that we may not want them to remove, and just how effective are they?
My understanding is that PolyFilters in general only reduce copper to 30-40 ppb (NSW is 5 ppb), so maybe that is not the best option. I'm not sure about Cuprisorb. Is there any data anywhere that these products or their ingredients/makeup are tested and the results are known for the efficiency in heavy metal reduction? In regards to zeolites, the "100% removal" of copper, lead, and zinc in the above paper refers to detection limits of copper 0.4 ppb, lead 1.0 ppb, and Zinc 1.0 ppb. This paper makes the particular zeolite tested look pretty good for copper, lead, and zinc.
Are zeolites maybe the best option? I know there are many zeolites though, and maybe others are not as effective in this respect. The zeolites used in the above paper (taken from the paper) was SIR-600 which is "the sodium–potassium form of a moist (approximately 10% water content), granular mineral produced from natural, purified, and back-washed zeolite (0030 to 1.2 mm particle
size)." Is that a product that is available to us hobbyists?
http://reef2reef.com/threads/do-zeolite-work-in-sea-water.231479
Here is very good reading with results from US EPA team's research:
https://www.acc.umu.se/~vatten/zeolite.pdf
[...]
In the same paper there are results showing zeolites could remove 100% of Copper, Lead and Zinc from sea water, which explain why Zeovit method is using copper containing supplements like ZeoSpur2 without constrains that copper will accumulate in the water column..
My question is not so much related to zeolites in particular, but heavy metal reduction in general. There are products on the market such as Cuprisorb and PolyFilter. There are probably some other newer products I'm not familiar with as well. We currently do not have an affordable way to measure NSW levels of heavy metals in our tanks (Triton can't test that low), and the occasional use of heavy metal reducing medias may not be a bad idea. I'm just wondering, what do these products remove that we may not want them to remove, and just how effective are they?
My understanding is that PolyFilters in general only reduce copper to 30-40 ppb (NSW is 5 ppb), so maybe that is not the best option. I'm not sure about Cuprisorb. Is there any data anywhere that these products or their ingredients/makeup are tested and the results are known for the efficiency in heavy metal reduction? In regards to zeolites, the "100% removal" of copper, lead, and zinc in the above paper refers to detection limits of copper 0.4 ppb, lead 1.0 ppb, and Zinc 1.0 ppb. This paper makes the particular zeolite tested look pretty good for copper, lead, and zinc.
Are zeolites maybe the best option? I know there are many zeolites though, and maybe others are not as effective in this respect. The zeolites used in the above paper (taken from the paper) was SIR-600 which is "the sodium–potassium form of a moist (approximately 10% water content), granular mineral produced from natural, purified, and back-washed zeolite (0030 to 1.2 mm particle
size)." Is that a product that is available to us hobbyists?
.



