Help Figuring ALK Uptake and math discrepency

gcrance

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
116
Reaction score
30
Location
springfield va
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
::CAUTION INBOUND TEXT WALL:: but all relevant to my question at the end


So im trying to figure out my daily alk uptake on my new tank i know its going to shift up and down a little as bioload increases and coraline gets going but this is really just to get a historlogical overview of how its running.

so tank specs
300g display
125 gallon sump

tank has 320lbs of rock. (was dry and currently cooking in the tank)
and 300lbs of sand. mix between coarse coral gravel and carib sea fiji pink fine sand
between substrate rock and equipment im figuring displacement loss around around -125g
so i have been estimating it to be closer to 350g actual system

so here is the hang up. i use the reef chemistry calculator found here:
http://reef.diesyst.com/chemcalc/chemcalc.html

i punch in 350g water volume my current alk desired alk and product type which im using the nionic bicarb system p1 and i get my result.

No biggie seems about normal i used this method on my 100g that i just broke down. and ive done this tank completely new. new tank, new equip (mostly) new rock, new sand, so everything is newish and im trying to get away from some of the bad habits i had with my other tank that caused some borderline irreparable problems with my old system. and thus far its been up for a month and i haven't had any issues except for a couple leaks here and there and a kind of surprising uptake in alk, but not crazy. i have moved a couple of hardier corals into the tank and my fish and everyone is doing just fine no complaints

Also this system has been on a prodibio dosing regiment from the start and i love it

So here is the hang up im having i have tested my alk everyday and i got down to 5.264dkh at one point because we were really testing anything except ammonia for the first month due to the new tank cycle and the prodibio being added just to make sure it was doing its job. (and it has wonderfully) and the few tester corals i put in have been doing great even a hydronphora frag is showing new growth on all its limbs. so once we noticed the low alk we decided it time to start bringing that back in line and picked up the daily testing and adjusting to get it all in check

so heres some of the more recent test results

6/6/16
tmp 76.7
ph 8.16
Sg 35ppt
Ca 410ppm
Mg 1350ppm
Alk 5.264dkh

now the following were just gonna focus on alk and ph because everything else stayed very stable within a couple tenths through today

6/7/16
ph 8.14
Alk 5.712 (added 150ml bionic part 1 7pm) about a .5dkh increse

6/8/16
ph 8.09
Alk 6.272 (added 150ml bionic part 1 7pm) about a .5dkh increse

6/9/16
ph 8.09
Alk 6.664 (added 150ml bionic part 1 7pm) about a .5dkh increse

notice a pattern? about a .5dkh increse daily from adding 150ml same time each day so one could say my daily uptake would be around .25dkh and 50ml daily the remaining 100ml added is what giving me my .5dkh increase daily until my target of 8.2-8.5ish dkh is reached

the math works in my head but maybe one of our resident science will show me where im wrong if im wrong

so here is a compounding discrepancy. we did not test on 6/10/16 and i just ran my test for today
6/11/16 and again we have stable params as described in the test from 6/6 no significant change
except alk which tested at 6.888dkh. now i expected it to be about a .25dkh increase since i skipped a day of adding bionic and a day of testing which was close enough

Again no biggie.

So i went back to the reef calc in the link above and tried to back engineer my total system volume based on my alk numbers and something doesn't add up

if i plug in 350g and my current alk as the 6/6 test of 5.264 and my desired alk of the 6/7 test of 5.712 i should come back with around 151ml of solution added to 350g assuming that estimate on total system volume is correct, but it doesnt i comes back with 264ml needed to be added almost a 115ml difference the only way i can get my dosed alk of 150ml daily to correspond with my tested numbers being input is to reduce the tank size down to 200g which i don't believe i have displaced 200 ish gallons of water with my rock sand and equipment partially because my test from 6/9 of 6.664 and 6/11 of 6.88 on 350g plugged in comes back at 151.3 as expected.

so i guess what im trying to verify here is it possible that im that wrong on my system volume and if so why does the math work for the 6/9 and 6/11 reads giving that ive skipped a day or is the reef chem calculator wrong or am i doing the reverse math really wrong.
 
To be more helpful, how are you measuring alkalinity?

Does the bottle say anything about the bicarb concentration or by how much the alkalinity is raised? ESV has different alkalinity products, might be worthwile to check if the right was given in the calculator. :)
 
@Habib(Salifert) i have been double testing via a hanna checker and a salifert test. And converting to dkh.

@Randy Holmes-Farley i snapped two pics of what i use and attached em with the directions
20160612_114331.jpg

20160612_114400.jpg
 
All right...

A) you used as input a product different from yours.

B) if I use the calculator using the right product and fictive values and compare it to the label concentration, there is a difference of 8%. I am doing something wrong or the calculator uses a wrong or an outdated concentration.

Regardless, making use of the concentration on the product's label:

"1 ml per gallon will raise the KH by 2.07 dKH"

150 ml will raise 150 x 2.07 = 310.5 dKH of 1 gallon water.

Assuming 350 gallons, the rise would be 310 / 350 = 0.89 dKH

Is that ok enough for you? :)
 
@JimWelsh yes i dilute it per the instructions. Has a line on yhe top of the bottle to either dilute with distilled or rodi water and shake like crazy to disolve the rock in the bottom. Or bath it in warm water vs shaking till your eyes bleed
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top