help me understand phosphates

larryhaynes

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
109
Reaction score
6
Location
santa barbara, ca.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
hello all, i am currently running bp and gfo in reactors , my po4 and no3 are ZERO..
i know this is not a good thing but is it REALLY a bad thing in an sps tank? i mean i had a 40g mixed reef before this NEW tank and was always fighting nutrients. so i decided to start off on the right foot with the new setup and am having problems getting po4 and no3 up a little i know it may sound stupid but i dont want to have the problems i had before!!! how do i safley get them up without turning off the reactors ? or is 0/0 ok what are the cons if i let it be ? 76g dt 30g sump 5-6 fish!!!
 
I had a similar issue with my setup using Red Sea test kits. I fed the fish a little more and put the protein skimmer on a timer for 4 hrs a day. That seemed to do the trick and I have 1-2 ppm NO3 and a measurable amount of PO4.
 
I use Hanna for po4 and salifert for no3

Which Hanna? A 0 ppb on the HI736 is low enough that it is worth considering allowing it to rise. A 0 ppm on the HI713 may not be too low.
 
So the 713 and the 736 are different? The 713 is the larger of the two I would assume it's more accurate maybe I'm wrong? Which one should I be using consistently I tested phosphates earlier today with the 713 and they read 0.02 when I use the smaller one 736, it says 0.00
 
Are the reagents different for the two I spoke to Hanna. A while back about the alkalinity reagents because they accidentally sent me once for freshwater and they said it didn't matter they were the same
 
I would not turn off the bp reactor ... The pellets won't tumble and the bacteria will grow them together in a sense .. Gfo reactor should be a low tumble usually with a smaller pump anyways .. Just give your fish some extra food for a while
 
Do you think skimming too much

High skimming alone does not usually end in phosphate too low, but the GFO can. I'd personally back off on the GFO.
 
So the 713 and the 736 are different? The 713 is the larger of the two I would assume it's more accurate maybe I'm wrong? Which one should I be using consistently I tested phosphates earlier today with the 713 and they read 0.02 when I use the smaller one 736, it says 0.00

They are different in that the 736 is a bit more sensitive. Which is more accurate in your hands is hard to say, but the 736 has a claimed uncertainty (by Hanna) of about +/- 0.015 ppm while the 713 is +/- 0.04 ppm phosphate.

I typically recommend 0.02 ppm as a good target, but 0.01 ppm is not generally too low, especially if you use coral foods too.
 
Just to make sure I understand the phosporous to phosphate conversion for the 736:

0.02 ppm phosphate is approx. 7 ppb phosphorous, correct?

(7ppb P x 3.066)/1000 is ~o.02pppm PO4
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top