Yes, sure, that makes sense but what is the percentage of failures considering the 10s of thousands of tanks sold and in service currently?
Nobody but the manufacter can provide that information, and they are unlikely to do so unless compelled by law or a marketing
We don't know if there are hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of tanks sold. We don't know if the affected tanks are all from one or two assemblers, batch runs, clamping tables, or just random over a several year period.
All we can do is draw logical conclusions based on facts and information that we do know.
How does that failure rate compare to other manufacturers? I've seen lots of other tanks mentioned also with failures so really would like to know how they all match up
We don't see reports of other brand failures with anywhere near this frequency or regularity or that follow a pattern.
We can apply basic statistical probability and principles like Occam's Razor.
We roughly know the size of the aquarium hobby (salt and fresh) we know roughly how many aquariums there are worldwide. We know roughly how long people keep them, etc. We know over the last 40 years that there are several large manufacturers, some still dominant in the market. We know that some of these sell coast-to-coast in high volume big-box pet stores. We know that these systems are many times more expensive that others and therefore sales volume compared to big box stores will be many times less. We know that there are currently a dozen or more manufacturers that build systems 50 gallons or larger.
We don't see the same rate of reported tanks form any single one of those companies currently or historically even all combined. The closet thing in my memory in 40 years of reefing was the Oceanic bow-front problems and that was minuscule compared to this.
. Of course you are not counting previously owned tanks in your opinion right because like buying a used car, sometimes it's great, sometimes not.
That makes absolutely no difference. A Pinto's gas tank was prone to rear-end explosion regardless if it was new or used. Toyota ball joint failures were owner agnostic, etc. Moreover, RedSea tanks are not the only tanks that change hands. All brands do and as with the basic understandings above, there are countless 50 gallon and above tanks in the world that are decades old and still in service through two or more owners. If you are going to apply logic, you must apply it evenly.
How do you factor owner negligence into your opinion?
Easily. RedSea owners do not appear to be any different or more negligent than other tank owners. If it was negligence to blame then we would see similar negligence failures across the market. Likewise, those statistically anomalous negligent RedSea owners would have a higher incidence of failure of other items as well.. lights, pumps, etc. We don't see that. Again, if you are going to apply logic, you must apply it evenly.
My LFS told me seam failures occur because people blast their powerheads against the sidewalls with way to much force. This certainly makes sense to me and may be a contributing factor to right?
No it does not makes sense to me whatsoever, the math does not work by any stretch of the imagination and I think whoever told you that from your LFS is s (frankly) uninformed and/or has a vested interest in not tarnishing the brand they sell.
If you want to argue sinusoidal wave makers that create a sloshing standing wave can damage tanks, I would absolutely agree. Back to Occam's Razor and what we know. I have not seen a single report of a person indicating that they were generating standing waves and sloshing several inches of water back and forth as a mass.