because test levels stated by aquarists using non digital kits rarely if ever match the readings for digital ones.
they're not really at zero usually in stocked tanks.
the reefers posting zero this or that are probably not right, yet umpires will accept any stated reading as verified fact and make a tank change recommend based on the stated levels. we see how this impacts cycling, it impacts it 100%.
the few test comparison threads Ive seen for common nitrate tests range dramatically on the same tank sample in most cases, the comparisons have been being logged years now. a few posted good matches to the hanna digital gear, most didnt and reported wildly for example between api and red sea nitrate/big variance on searchable threads. mis testing factors.
some tanks like zeovit setups were purposefully ran with low/accurately tracked numbers in those cases they were feeding well and dosing an array of supports but it wasnt allowed to break down into waste within the tank, it was handled or exported before it contributed to compiling nitrate and phosphate numbers.