Most drinking water systems use 10 micron or maybe 5 micron sediment filters and only nominal rated, which are about as effective as a screen door at protecting the billions of tiny pores in the cabon block which remove chlorine and volatile organics like herbicides, pesticides and fuel byproducts. A reef quality system uses a 1 micron or prefferably a 0.5 or even 0.2 micron and absolutely rated not nominal rated sediment filter so it protects the carbons pores so it can do its job of protecting the RO membrane.
Many drinking water systems still use granular activated carbon which truth be told lasts about 300 total gallons (60 treated and 240 waste gallons at 4:1 waste ratio). Others use 5 or 10 micron carbons which last a maximum of 6,000 to maybe 9,000 total gallons (again 1,200 to 1,500 treated gallons and 4,800 to 7,500 waste gallons) while a real reef quality system will use a SINGLE 1 micron or better yet 0.6 or 0.5 micron near absolute rated carbon block which lasts longer and filters better leading to a lower cost of ownership and longer RO membrane life.
Drinking water membranes can be 90% efficient or rejection rate and thats OK since TDS is not an issue with drinking water. Ree fsystems should use at least a 98% rejection rate and treated and tested membranes are bette rthan off the shelf dry untested and non guaranteed membranes as you just purchased. As I said before a 1 or 2% increase in efficiency can mean hundreds of dollars over the life of the membrane.
Many drinking water systems still use granular activated carbon which truth be told lasts about 300 total gallons (60 treated and 240 waste gallons at 4:1 waste ratio). Others use 5 or 10 micron carbons which last a maximum of 6,000 to maybe 9,000 total gallons (again 1,200 to 1,500 treated gallons and 4,800 to 7,500 waste gallons) while a real reef quality system will use a SINGLE 1 micron or better yet 0.6 or 0.5 micron near absolute rated carbon block which lasts longer and filters better leading to a lower cost of ownership and longer RO membrane life.
Drinking water membranes can be 90% efficient or rejection rate and thats OK since TDS is not an issue with drinking water. Ree fsystems should use at least a 98% rejection rate and treated and tested membranes are bette rthan off the shelf dry untested and non guaranteed membranes as you just purchased. As I said before a 1 or 2% increase in efficiency can mean hundreds of dollars over the life of the membrane.


