Humic substances

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cory
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None

Cory

More than 25 years reefing
View Badges
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
6,882
Reaction score
3,137
Location
Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What do they say here? Are they implying that humic substances inhibit calcium carbonate?

Chemical Geology
Volume 201, Issues 1–2, 14 November 2003, Pages 91-101
The influence of dissolved humic acids on the kinetics of calcite precipitation from seawater solutions
Author links open overlay panelPierpaoloZuddasDamienFaivre
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(03)00230-4Get rights and content

Abstract
The influence of dissolved organic matter on the complex mechanism of calcite crystal growth from seawater was evaluated by a set of experiments at different humic acid concentrations (i.e. [HA]=50, 500, 1000 μg/kg) in NaCl–CaCl2 solutions at a total ionic strength of 0.7 mol/kg. The temperature and PCO2 of the experiments were maintained at 298 K and 40 Pa, respectively. The constant addition technique was used in order to maintain [Ca2+] at ≅10.5 mmol/kg, while the [CO32−] was varied to isolate its role on the precipitation rate. Assuming that the calcite precipitation in this solution is dominated by the reaction:

(A1)Ca2++CO32−↔kbkfCaCO3" role="presentation" style="box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; line-height: normal; font-size: 14.4px; word-spacing: normal; word-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; position: relative;">Ca2++CO32−↔kbkfCaCO3
where kf and kb are the forward and reverse reaction rate constants, respectively, the net precipitation rate, R, can be described at any dissolved organic matter content by the difference between the forward and reverse rates:
(A2)R=kf(aCa2+)n1(aCO32−)n2−kb" role="presentation" style="box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; line-height: normal; font-size: 14.4px; word-spacing: normal; word-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; position: relative;">R=kf(aCa2+)n1(aCO32−)n2−kb
or, in its logarithmic form:
(A3)log(R+kb)−logKf+n2log[CO32−]" role="presentation" style="box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; line-height: normal; font-size: 14.4px; word-spacing: normal; word-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; position: relative;">log(R+kb)−logKf+n2log[CO32−]
where ni are the partial reaction orders with respect to the participating ions, a and γ are the ion activities and activity coefficients, respectively, and, Kf=kf(aCa2+)n1 (γCO32−)n2, a constant.


Results of this study indicate that, similarly to seawater and NaCl–CaCl2 solutions at the same ionic strength, the partial reaction order with respect to the carbonate ion concentration is 3, while the forward reaction rate constant, Kf, decreases by one order of magnitude when the dissolved organic matter concentration increased from 0 to 1000 μg/kg. This suggests that the mechanism of calcite precipitation is independent of the dissolved organic matter concentration even if such a component inhibits the calcite precipitation rate. Applying our model to previous rate measurements carried out in seawater solution under the compositional condition [Ca2+]≫[CO32−], we found that the rate of calcite precipitation from seawater solutions, a complex function of PCO2 and seawater inorganic inhibitors, still decreases as a function of the [HA] by at least one order of magnitude. Finally, we propose that the dissolved organic matter under the form of HA inhibits the calcite precipitation rate from seawater by covering the active growth sites rather than by complexation of calcium in solution.

Keywords
Kinetics
Calcite crystal growth
Organic matter
Seawater
Choose an option to locate/access this article:
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution.

Check Access
or
PurchaseRent at DeepDyve
or
Check for this article elsewhere

Copyright © 2003 Published by Elsevier B.V.

About ScienceDirectRemote accessShopping cartContact and supportTerms and conditionsPrivacy policy
Cookies are used by this site. For more information, visit the cookies page.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. or its licensors or contributors. ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
 
How about this one? Are they saying that humic substances like that from wheat for example stops corraline algae from growing?

Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
Volume 241, Issue 2, 17 August 1999, Pages 193-205
The role of terrestrial humic substances on the shift of kelp community to crustose coralline algae community of the southern Hokkaido Island in the Japan Sea
Author links open overlay panelKatsuhikoMatsunagaaGoroNigia
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(99)00077-5Get rights and content

Abstract
Crustose coralline algae dominates coastal rocky shores (crust-dominated community) in certain world coastal zones after the disappearance of kelp forest community. Local fisheries suffer greatly when this occurs. Well known ecological hypothese to explain this phenomenon such as sea urchin excessive grazing and anomalously high temperature events do not satisfactorily explain the shift in algal composition in the Japan Sea coast. Previously we have shown that coralline algae has a competitive edge over other algae under the extremely low iron levels associated with deforestation in the Japan Sea along the coast of the southern Hokkaido Island. In the present study we present direct evidence that forest-derived humic substances inhibit crustose coralline algal spore germination and also promote macroalgal oogonium formation. Our results strongly suggest that suburban development associated with deforestation in the Japan Sea coast watershed reduced the flux of humic substances into coastal water and in turn created an environment in which coralline algae dominate over other algae.

Keywords
Carbon isotope
Crustose coralline algae
Humic substances
Kelp forest
Macroalgal oogonium
Zoospore
Choose an option to locate/access this article:
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution.

Check Access
or
PurchaseRent at DeepDyve
or
Check for this article elsewhere

Copyright © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

About ScienceDirectRemote accessShopping cartContact and supportTerms and conditionsPrivacy policy
Cookies are used by this site. For more information, visit the cookies page.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. or its licensors or contributors. ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
 
Yes, many organics are known to inhibit the precipitation of calcium carbonate by getting onto the growing crystal surface and preventing more precipitation (just like magnesium does).

That's why I suggest allowing organics to rise in situations where abiotic precipitation have become a problem. :)

The second one makes the claim that you suggest, but it seems like a complicated conclusion since there may be many factors involved (like saying cancer is caused by x-rays, possibly ignoring other causes). :)
 
Yeah the reason i asked was just because i started running ozone in my tank. I was looking for evidence of how to increase coral growth/ corraline growth.
 
Yeah the reason i asked was just because i started running ozone in my tank. I was looking for evidence of how to increase coral growth/ corraline growth.

I wouldn't be convinced that adding humic substances will promote coralline. :)
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top