- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
- Messages
- 37
- Reaction score
- 26
- Location
- Huntsville, AL
- What state or country do you live in
- Alabama
Hello Reef2Reef. I am getting back into the hobby and currently in the planning/collecting equipment stage. I have been researching silently and have a question I was unable answer with research and Google searches. I would like as many fail-safes as possible to prevent crashes. In the event of a skimmer failure that might require more than a few days to resolve, what, in everybody's opinion, is the best method to maintain a reef and prevent disaster? I plan to run activated carbon through a reactor. Could an increased amount of carbon and/or replacement frequency work as a temporary skimmer replacement? Would this work better combined with decreased feeding? Would gfo also be necessary? I would like to be prepared rather than possibly have to ask this question in a true emergency. I have considered a refugium with multiple macros but through my research I do not believe any macro running concurrent with a skimmer would be able to suddenly absorb the elevated nutrient load in the event the skimmer was to go offline. I am interested to hear others opinions. If this has been covered multiple times before a link to the discussions would be appreciated. Thanks everybody.




